These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23864603)

  • 1. The excuse principle can maintain cooperation through forgivable defection in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.
    Krams I; Kokko H; Vrublevska J; Abolins-Abols M; Krama T; Rantala MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Sep; 280(1766):20131475. PubMed ID: 23864603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mistakes allow evolutionary stability in the repeated prisoner's dilemma game.
    Boyd R
    J Theor Biol; 1989 Jan; 136(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 2779259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term social bonds promote cooperation in the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.
    St-Pierre A; Larose K; Dubois F
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Dec; 276(1676):4223-8. PubMed ID: 19740884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simple rule of direct reciprocity leads to the stable coexistence of cooperation and defection in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.
    Zheng XD; Li C; Yu JR; Wang SC; Fan SJ; Zhang BY; Tao Y
    J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 420():12-17. PubMed ID: 28259660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Duality between cooperation and defection in the presence of tit-for-tat in replicator dynamics.
    Baek SK; Yi SD; Jeong HC
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Oct; 430():215-220. PubMed ID: 28755954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatialization and greater generosity in the stochastic Prisoner's Dilemma.
    Grim P
    Biosystems; 1996; 37(1-2):3-17. PubMed ID: 8924636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wealth-relative effects in cooperation games.
    Shuler RL
    Heliyon; 2019 Dec; 5(12):e02958. PubMed ID: 31872125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combination with anti-tit-for-tat remedies problems of tit-for-tat.
    Yi SD; Baek SK; Choi JK
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Jan; 412():1-7. PubMed ID: 27670803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma.
    Kuhlman DM; Marshello AF
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1975 Nov; 32(5):922-31. PubMed ID: 1185519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Valuing rewards to others in a prisoner's dilemma game.
    Safin V; Locey ML; Rachlin H
    Behav Processes; 2013 Oct; 99():145-9. PubMed ID: 23876391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cooperative responses in rats playing a 2 × 2 game: Effects of opponent strategy, payoff, and oxytocin.
    Donovan A; Ryan E; Wood RI
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2020 Nov; 121():104803. PubMed ID: 32755813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The continuous prisoner's dilemma and the evolution of cooperation through reciprocal altruism with variable investment.
    Killingback T; Doebeli M
    Am Nat; 2002 Oct; 160(4):421-38. PubMed ID: 18707520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human cooperation in the simultaneous and the alternating Prisoner's Dilemma: Pavlov versus Generous Tit-for-Tat.
    Wedekind C; Milinski M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(7):2686-9. PubMed ID: 11607644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contingencies of reinforcement in a five-person prisoner's dilemma.
    Yi R; Rachlin H
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Sep; 82(2):161-76. PubMed ID: 15540503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.
    Nowak M; Sigmund K
    Nature; 1993 Jul; 364(6432):56-8. PubMed ID: 8316296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between cooperation in an iterated prisoner's dilemma game and the discounting of hypothetical outcomes.
    Yi R; Johnson MW; Bickel WK
    Learn Behav; 2005 Aug; 33(3):324-36. PubMed ID: 16396079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No strategy is evolutionarily stable in the repeated prisoner's dilemma.
    Lorberbaum J
    J Theor Biol; 1994 May; 168(2):117-30. PubMed ID: 8022193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tit-for-tat or win-stay, lose-shift?
    Imhof LA; Fudenberg D; Nowak MA
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Aug; 247(3):574-80. PubMed ID: 17481667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resolving the iterated prisoner's dilemma: theory and reality.
    Raihani NJ; Bshary R
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Aug; 24(8):1628-39. PubMed ID: 21599777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cooperation among unrelated individuals: reciprocal altruism, by-product mutualism and group selection in fishes.
    Dugatkin LA; Mesterton-Gibbons M
    Biosystems; 1996; 37(1-2):19-30. PubMed ID: 8924635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.