These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23864646)

  • 1. Recognition errors suggest fast familiarity and slow recollection in rhesus monkeys.
    Basile BM; Hampton RR
    Learn Mem; 2013 Jul; 20(8):431-7. PubMed ID: 23864646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The amygdala is not necessary for the familiarity aspect of recognition memory.
    Basile BM; Costa VD; Schafroth JL; Karaskiewicz CL; Lucas DR; Murray EA
    Nat Commun; 2023 Dec; 14(1):8109. PubMed ID: 38062014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Similar time course of fast familiarity and slow recollection processes for recognition memory in humans and macaques.
    Wu Z; Kavanova M; Hickman L; Lin F; Buckley MJ
    Learn Mem; 2020 Jul; 27(7):258-269. PubMed ID: 32540915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Process dissociation of familiarity and recollection in children: response deadline affects recollection but not familiarity.
    Koenig L; Wimmer MC; Hollins TJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Mar; 131():120-34. PubMed ID: 25544395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognition memory: adding a response deadline eliminates recollection but spares familiarity.
    Sauvage MM; Beer Z; Eichenbaum H
    Learn Mem; 2010 Feb; 17(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 20154356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing recollection and familiarity of similar lures in a behavioral pattern separation task.
    Kim J; Yassa MA
    Hippocampus; 2013 Apr; 23(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 23401187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An animal model of amnesia that uses Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis to distinguish recollection from familiarity deficits in recognition memory.
    Eichenbaum H; Fortin N; Sauvage M; Robitsek RJ; Farovik A
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(8):2281-9. PubMed ID: 19772865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two processes support visual recognition memory in rhesus monkeys.
    Guderian S; Brigham D; Mishkin M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Nov; 108(48):19425-30. PubMed ID: 22084079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Old processes, new perspectives: Familiarity is correlated with (not independent of) recollection and is more (not equally) variable for targets than for lures.
    Moran R; Goshen-Gottstein Y
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Jun; 79():40-67. PubMed ID: 25899705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Not all sources of familiarity are created equal: the case of word frequency and repetition in episodic recognition.
    Coane JH; Balota DA; Dolan PO; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):791-805. PubMed ID: 21264634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive mechanisms of false facial recognition in older adults.
    Edmonds EC; Glisky EL; Bartlett JC; Rapcsak SZ
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 21787088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repetition increases false recollection in older people.
    Pitarque A; Sales A; Meléndez JC; Algarabel S
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Feb; 56(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 25330138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Critical tests of the continuous dual-process model of recognition.
    Cha J; Dobbins IG
    Cognition; 2021 Oct; 215():104827. PubMed ID: 34229131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Familiarity, recollection, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves in recognition memory.
    Juola JF; Caballero-Sanz A; Muñoz-García AR; Botella J; Suero M
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):855-876. PubMed ID: 30949925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time.
    Shaffer RA; McDermott KB
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107298. PubMed ID: 31838098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Continuous recollection versus unitized familiarity in associative recognition.
    Mickes L; Johnson EM; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):843-63. PubMed ID: 20565205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Item repetition and response deadline affect familiarity and recollection differently across childhood.
    Koenig L; Wimmer MC; Trippas D
    Memory; 2020 Aug; 28(7):900-907. PubMed ID: 32657641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Associative interference in recognition memory: a dual-process account.
    Verde MF
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Dec; 32(8):1273-83. PubMed ID: 15900921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural correlates of recollection and familiarity: a review of neuroimaging and patient data.
    Skinner EI; Fernandes MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jun; 45(10):2163-79. PubMed ID: 17445844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of the human hippocampus in familiarity-based and recollection-based recognition memory.
    Wixted JT; Squire LR
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Dec; 215(2):197-208. PubMed ID: 20412819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.