These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23865583)

  • 21. The effect of incremental versus bulk fill techniques on the microleakage of composite resin using a glass-ionomer liner.
    Puckett A; Fitchie J; Hembree J; Smith J
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(5):186-91. PubMed ID: 1289865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of centripetal and incremental methods in Class II composite resin restorations on gingival microleakage.
    Ghavamnasiri M; Moosavi H; Tahvildarnejad N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 17277834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer.
    Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1437685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of shear bond strength of silorane resin to conventional, resin-modified glass ionomers and nano-ionomer cements.
    Babannavar R; Shenoy A
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 23355365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Coronal microleakage in conservatively restored endodontic access preparations.
    Kleitches AJ; Lemon RR; Jeansonne BG
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1995 Jan; 75(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 9520778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reducing microleakage with the glass-ionomer/resin sandwich technique.
    Schwartz JL; Anderson MH; Pelleu GB
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(5):186-92. PubMed ID: 2098728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microleakage comparison of dentin bonding systems with glass ionomer.
    Chohayeb AA
    Dent Mater; 1992 Jan; 8(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 1521681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microleakage of Class II silver glass ionomer/composite restorations.
    Stratmann RG; Donly KJ
    Am J Dent; 1991 Apr; 4(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 1906718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
    Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.
    Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sealing capacity of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite placed in vivo in Class 5 restorations.
    Ferrari M; Davidson CL
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 8957921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro marginal leakage of Class II composite resin restorations by thermal cycling.
    Futatsuki M; Nakata M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 18(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 8054304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Handpieces for Class II Preparation and Microleakage of Silorane- or Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations.
    Ergin E; Oz FD; Gurgan S
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Sep; 36(9):499-505. PubMed ID: 30188252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage of tooth-colored restorations with a beveled gingival margin.
    Owens BM; Halter TK; Brown DM
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jun; 29(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 9728146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Early marginal microleakage in Class II resin composite restorations.
    Prati C
    Dent Mater; 1989 Nov; 5(6):392-8. PubMed ID: 2700974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microleakage of Gluma Bond, Scotchbond 2 and a glass ionomer/composite sandwich technique.
    Reeves GW; Fitchie JG; Scarbrough AR; Hembree JH
    Am J Dent; 1990 Oct; 3(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 2127533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques.
    Beznos C
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 11203779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simultaneous activation technique: an alternative for bonding composite resin to glass ionomer.
    Pinheiro SL; Oda M; Matson E; Duarte DA; Guedes-Pinto AC
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 12889705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An in-vitro investigation of microleakage and gap size of glass ionomer/composite resin "sandwich" restorations in primary teeth.
    Reid JS; Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Williams CE
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1994; 61(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7989627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.