168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23865896)
1. New York State TrueAllele ® casework validation study.
Perlin MW; Belrose JL; Duceman BW
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1458-66. PubMed ID: 23865896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validating TrueAllele
Bauer DW; Butt N; Hornyak JM; Perlin MW
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):380-398. PubMed ID: 31580496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA mixture genotyping by probabilistic computer interpretation of binomially-sampled laser captured cell populations: combining quantitative data for greater identification information.
Ballantyne J; Hanson EK; Perlin MW
Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 23601717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validating TrueAllele® DNA mixture interpretation.
Perlin MW; Legler MM; Spencer CE; Smith JL; Allan WP; Belrose JL; Duceman BW
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(6):1430-47. PubMed ID: 21827458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. TrueAllele casework on Virginia DNA mixture evidence: computer and manual interpretation in 72 reported criminal cases.
Perlin MW; Dormer K; Hornyak J; Schiermeier-Wood L; Greenspoon S
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e92837. PubMed ID: 24667531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Establishing the Limits of TrueAllele® Casework: A Validation Study.
Greenspoon SA; Schiermeier-Wood L; Jenkins BC
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Sep; 60(5):1263-76. PubMed ID: 26258391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Developmental validation of STRmix™, expert software for the interpretation of forensic DNA profiles.
Bright JA; Taylor D; McGovern C; Cooper S; Russell L; Abarno D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jul; 23():226-239. PubMed ID: 27235797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Probabilistic genotyping software: An overview.
Coble MD; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():219-224. PubMed ID: 30458407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Commentary on: Thompson WC. Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: A case study comparing STRmix™ and TrueAllele®. J Forensic Sci. 2023;68(3):1049-63.
Perlin MW; Butt N; Wilson MR
J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jul; 69(4):1516-1518. PubMed ID: 38664900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: A case study comparing STRMix™ and TrueAllele™.
Thompson WC
J Forensic Sci; 2023 May; 68(3):1049-1063. PubMed ID: 36847295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correcting forensic DNA errors.
Hampikian G
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():32-33. PubMed ID: 30947116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of probabilistic genotyping software for use in forensic DNA casework: Definitions and illustrations.
Haned H; Gill P; Lohmueller K; Inman K; Rudin N
Sci Justice; 2016 Mar; 56(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 26976468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Probabilistic Genotyping Software STRmix: Utility and Evidence for its Validity.
Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Gittelson S; Moretti TR; Onorato AJ; Bieber FR; Budowle B; Taylor DA
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):393-405. PubMed ID: 30132900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles.
Adamowicz MS; Rambo TN; Clarke JL
Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of Probabilistic Genotyping Software for Single Cell STR Analysis.
Huffman K; Ballantyne J
Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Compound and Conditioned Likelihood Ratio Behavior within a Probabilistic Genotyping Context.
Duke K; Cuenca D; Myers S; Wallin J
Genes (Basel); 2022 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 36360267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the LUS in sequence allele designations to facilitate probabilistic genotyping of NGS-based STR typing results.
Just RS; Irwin JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():197-205. PubMed ID: 29525576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of a method for weighting a range in the number of contributors in probabilistic genotyping.
McGovern C; Cheng K; Kelly H; Ciecko A; Taylor D; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102352. PubMed ID: 32707473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
