BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23865896)

  • 21. Probabilistic genotyping of single cell replicates from complex DNA mixtures recovers higher contributor LRs than standard analysis.
    Huffman K; Hanson E; Ballantyne J
    Sci Justice; 2022 Mar; 62(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 35277229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. DNAxs/DNAStatistX: Development and validation of a software suite for the data management and probabilistic interpretation of DNA profiles.
    Benschop CCG; Hoogenboom J; Hovers P; Slagter M; Kruise D; Parag R; Steensma K; Slooten K; Nagel JHA; Dieltjes P; van Marion V; van Paassen H; de Jong J; Creeten C; Sijen T; Kneppers ALJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():81-89. PubMed ID: 31254947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX13): A modern analysis.
    Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Cheng K; Budowle B; Coble MD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():172-179. PubMed ID: 30176439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using big data from probabilistic genotyping to solve crime.
    Taylor D; Abarno D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Mar; 57():102631. PubMed ID: 34861631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Application of a probabilistic genotyping software to MPS mixture STR data is supported by similar trends in LRs compared with CE data.
    Benschop CCG; van der Gaag KJ; de Vreede J; Backx AJ; de Leeuw RH; Zuñiga S; Hoogenboom J; de Knijff P; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102489. PubMed ID: 33677249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of likelihood ratios with and without assuming relatedness for DNA mixtures interpreted using a continuous model.
    Kruijver M; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jan; 62():102800. PubMed ID: 36372011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Searching CODIS with binary conversions of STRmix interpretations.
    Myers S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102569. PubMed ID: 34428671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validation of a top-down DNA profile analysis for database searching using a fully continuous probabilistic genotyping model.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Scandrett L; Abarno D; Lee SI; Wivell R; Kelly H; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102479. PubMed ID: 33588348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST.
    Bright JA; Richards R; Kruijver M; Kelly H; McGovern C; Magee A; McWhorter A; Ciecko A; Peck B; Baumgartner C; Buettner C; McWilliams S; McKenna C; Gallacher C; Mallinder B; Wright D; Johnson D; Catella D; Lien E; O'Connor C; Duncan G; Bundy J; Echard J; Lowe J; Stewart J; Corrado K; Gentile S; Kaplan M; Hassler M; McDonald N; Hulme P; Oefelein RH; Montpetit S; Strong M; Noël S; Malsom S; Myers S; Welti S; Moretti T; McMahon T; Grill T; Kalafut T; Greer-Ritzheimer M; Beamer V; Taylor DA; Buckleton JS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():11-24. PubMed ID: 29367014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation.
    Alfonse LE; Tejada G; Swaminathan H; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27907229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Production of high-fidelity electropherograms results in improved and consistent DNA interpretation: Standardizing the forensic validation process.
    Peters KC; Swaminathan H; Sheehan J; Duffy KR; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Nov; 31():160-170. PubMed ID: 28950155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Single-cell investigative genetics: Single-cell data produces genotype distributions concentrated at the true genotype across all mixture complexities.
    Grgicak CM; Bhembe Q; Slooten K; Sheth NC; Duffy KR; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Mar; 69():103000. PubMed ID: 38199167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Re: Riman et al. Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset.
    Buckleton J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Wivell R; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Benschop C; Budowle B; Coble M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102709. PubMed ID: 35459634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Developmental validation of QIAGEN Investigator
    Kraemer M; Prochnow A; Bussmann M; Scherer M; Peist R; Steffen C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():9-20. PubMed ID: 28343098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. STRmix™ collaborative exercise on DNA mixture interpretation.
    Bright JA; Cheng K; Kerr Z; McGovern C; Kelly H; Moretti TR; Smith MA; Bieber FR; Budowle B; Coble MD; Alghafri R; Allen PS; Barber A; Beamer V; Buettner C; Russell M; Gehrig C; Hicks T; Charak J; Cheong-Wing K; Ciecko A; Davis CT; Donley M; Pedersen N; Gartside B; Granger D; Greer-Ritzheimer M; Reisinger E; Kennedy J; Grammer E; Kaplan M; Hansen D; Larsen HJ; Laureano A; Li C; Lien E; Lindberg E; Kelly C; Mallinder B; Malsom S; Yacovone-Margetts A; McWhorter A; Prajapati SM; Powell T; Shutler G; Stevenson K; Stonehouse AR; Smith L; Murakami J; Halsing E; Wright D; Clark L; Taylor DA; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():1-8. PubMed ID: 30665115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Exploring the probative value of mixed DNA profiles.
    Kruijver M; Bright JA; Kelly H; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():1-10. PubMed ID: 30913444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Casework applications of probabilistic genotyping methods for DNA mixtures that allow relationships between contributors.
    Green PJ; Mortera J; Prieto L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102482. PubMed ID: 33640736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interpretation of complex forensic DNA mixtures.
    Ladd C; Lee HC; Yang N; Bieber FR
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 11387631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An assessment of the performance of the probabilistic genotyping software EuroForMix: Trends in likelihood ratios and analysis of Type I & II errors.
    Benschop CCG; Nijveld A; Duijs FE; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():31-38. PubMed ID: 31212207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.