242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23866788)
21. Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided brush cytology for diagnosis of patients with malignant obstruction of the bile duct.
Foutch PG; Kerr DM; Harlan JR; Manne RK; Kummet TD; Sanowski RA
Am J Gastroenterol; 1990 Jul; 85(7):791-5. PubMed ID: 2164768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Factors affecting the yield of brush cytology for the diagnosis of pancreatic and biliary cancers.
Parsi MA; Deepinder F; Lopez R; Stevens T; Dodig M; Zuccaro G
Pancreas; 2011 Jan; 40(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 20871478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP.
Macken E; Drijkoningen M; Van Aken E; Van Steenbergen W
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2000; 63(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 11189981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Intraductal optical coherence tomography during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for investigation of biliary strictures.
Arvanitakis M; Hookey L; Tessier G; Demetter P; Nagy N; Stellke A; De Maertelaer V; Devière J; Le Moine O
Endoscopy; 2009 Aug; 41(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 19618343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Advances in the endoscopic management of patients with pancreatic and biliary malignancies.
Brugge WR
South Med J; 2006 Dec; 99(12):1358-66. PubMed ID: 17233192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Classification of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy findings in pancreaticobiliary strictures.
Meining A; Shah RJ; Slivka A; Pleskow D; Chuttani R; Stevens PD; Becker V; Chen YK
Endoscopy; 2012 Mar; 44(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 22261749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biliary dysplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: additional value of DNA ploidity.
Halme L; Arola J; Numminen K; Krogerus L; Mäkisalo H; Färkkilä M
Liver Int; 2012 May; 32(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 22098817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A multistep cytological approach for patients with jaundice and biliary strictures of indeterminate origin.
Boldorini R; Paganotti A; Andorno S; Orlando S; Mercalli F; Orsello M; Ballarè M; Magnani C; Sartori M
J Clin Pathol; 2015 Apr; 68(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 25681513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Identification of factors predictive of malignancy in patients with atypical biliary brushing results obtained via ERCP.
Witt BL; Kristen Hilden RN; Scaife C; Chadwick B; Layfield L; Cory Johnston W; Safaee M; Siddiqui A; Adler DG
Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Aug; 41(8):682-8. PubMed ID: 23008113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Efficacy of endoscopic wire guided biliary brushing in the evaluation of biliary strictures.
Sachdev A; Duseja A; Bhalla A; Handa U; Sandhu BS; Gupta V; Kochhar S
Trop Gastroenterol; 2003; 24(4):215-7. PubMed ID: 15164539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. FISHing for pancreatobiliary tract malignancy in endoscopic brushings enhances the sensitivity of routine cytology.
Barr Fritcher EG; Kipp BR; Halling KC; Clayton AC
Cytopathology; 2014 Oct; 25(5):288-301. PubMed ID: 25073411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prospective randomized controlled study comparing cell block method and conventional smear method for pancreatic juice cytology.
Noda Y; Fujita N; Kobayashi G; Ito K; Horaguchi J; Obana T; Koshita S; Kanno Y; Yamashita Y; Kato Y; Ogawa T; Tsuchiya T; Oikawa M; Sawai T; Kanno H; Kurose A
Dig Endosc; 2012 May; 24(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 22507091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Prospective comparative study of ERCP brush cytology and EUS-FNA for the differential diagnosis of biliary strictures].
Novis M; Ardengh JC; Libera ED; Nakao FS; Ornellas LC; Santo GC; Venco F; Ferrari AP
Rev Col Bras Cir; 2010 Jun; 37(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 21079891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Scraping cytology with a guidewire for pancreatic-ductal strictures.
Uehara H; Tatsumi K; Masuda E; Kato M; Kizu T; Ishida T; Takakura R; Takano Y; Nakaizumi A; Ishikawa O; Takenaka A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jul; 70(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 19249043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A prospective randomised study of dense Infinity cytological brush versus regularly used brush in pancreaticobiliary malignancy.
Kylänpää L; Boyd S; Ristimäki A; Lindström O; Udd M; Halttunen J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016; 51(5):590-3. PubMed ID: 26642244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Endoscopic retrograde brush cytology. A new technique.
Venu RP; Geenen JE; Kini M; Hogan WJ; Payne M; Johnson GK; Schmalz MJ
Gastroenterology; 1990 Nov; 99(5):1475-9. PubMed ID: 2210255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnosing Biliary Malignancy.
Xu MM; Sethi A
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2015 Oct; 25(4):677-90. PubMed ID: 26431597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Usefulness of brush cytology combined with pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: significance of pancreatic juice cytology after brushing.
Yamaguchi T; Shirai Y; Nakamura N; Sudo K; Nakamura K; Hironaka S; Hara T; Denda T
Pancreas; 2012 Nov; 41(8):1225-9. PubMed ID: 23086246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Strategies for improving diagnostic accuracy of biliary strictures.
Salomao M; Gonda TA; Margolskee E; Eguia V; Remotti H; Poneros JM; Sethi A; Saqi A
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Apr; 123(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 25564796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
