1370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23866805)
1. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.
Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study.
Glauber M; Miceli A; Gilmanov D; Ferrarini M; Bevilacqua S; Farneti PA; Solinas M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 May; 145(5):1222-6. PubMed ID: 22516391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement using right minithoracotomy is associated with better outcomes than ministernotomy.
Miceli A; Murzi M; Gilmanov D; Fugà R; Ferrarini M; Solinas M; Glauber M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jul; 148(1):133-7. PubMed ID: 24035370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis.
Dalén M; Biancari F; Rubino AS; Santarpino G; Glaser N; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Juvonen T; Deste W; Pollari F; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Svenarud P; Sartipy U
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 25653252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Right anterior minithoracotomy for aortic valve replacement: 10-year experience of a single center.
Glauber M; Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Chiaramonti F; Murzi M; Solinas M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Sep; 150(3):548-56.e2. PubMed ID: 26215359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of minimally invasive and standard aortic valve replacement.
Stoliński J; Plicner D; Grudzień G; Wąsowicz M; Musiał R; Andres J; Kapelak B
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Oct; 152(4):1030-9. PubMed ID: 27449562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: Comparison of long-term outcomes.
Ariyaratnam P; Loubani M; Griffin SC
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2015 Sep; 23(7):814-21. PubMed ID: 25991010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Traditional Sternotomy Versus Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Stratified by Ejection Fraction.
Nguyen TC; Thourani VH; Pham JQ; Zhao Y; Terwelp MD; Balan P; Ocazionez D; Loghin C; Smalling RW; Estrera AL; Lamelas J
Innovations (Phila); 2017; 12(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 28099179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Via Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy: Propensity Matched Initial Experience.
Seitz M; Goldblatt J; Paul E; Marcus T; Larobina M; Yap CH
Heart Lung Circ; 2019 Feb; 28(2):320-326. PubMed ID: 29291961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aortic valve replacement via right minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy: a propensity score analysis.
Glower DD; Desai BS; Hughes GC; Milano CA; Gaca JG
Innovations (Phila); 2014; 9(2):75-81; discussion 81. PubMed ID: 24758951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined Mitral and Aortic Valve Procedure via Right Mini-Thoracotomy versus Full Median Sternotomy.
Zhao D; Wei L; Zhu S; Zhang Z; Liu H; Yang Y; Wang Y; Ji Q; Wang C
Int Heart J; 2019 Mar; 60(2):336-344. PubMed ID: 30799378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of Adjuncts Reduces Cardiopulmonary Bypass Time During Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement.
Wang A; McCartney SL; Williams JB; Ganapathi A; Glower DD; Nicoara A; Gaca JG
J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Mar; 26(2):155-160. PubMed ID: 28820544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.
Hiraoka A; Totsugawa T; Kuinose M; Nakajima K; Chikazawa G; Tamura K; Yoshitaka H; Sakaguchi T
Circ J; 2014; 78(12):2876-81. PubMed ID: 25421231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.
Kirmani BH; Jones SG; Malaisrie SC; Chung DA; Williams RJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD011793. PubMed ID: 28394022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Propensity score analysis of outcomes following minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement.
Shehada SE; Öztürk Ö; Wottke M; Lange R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Feb; 49(2):464-9; discussion 469-70. PubMed ID: 25732967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Study From the UK National Data.
Attia RQ; Hickey GL; Grant SW; Bridgewater B; Roxburgh JC; Kumar P; Ridley P; Bhabra M; Millner RW; Athanasiou T; Casula R; Chukwuemka A; Pillay T; Young CP
Innovations (Phila); 2016; 11(1):15-23; discussion 23. PubMed ID: 26926521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sutureless aortic valve implantation through an upper v-type ministernotomy: an innovative approach in high-risk patients.
Concistrè G; Miceli A; Chiaramonti F; Farneti P; Bevilacqua S; Varone E; Solinas M; Glauber M
Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 23571790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved Patient Recovery With Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Study.
Bruno P; Cammertoni F; Rosenhek R; Mazza A; Pavone N; Iafrancesco M; Nesta M; Chiariello GA; Spalletta C; Graziano G; Sanesi V; D'Errico D; Massetti M
Innovations (Phila); 2019 Oct; 14(5):419-427. PubMed ID: 31431105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
