BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23868567)

  • 1. Phrenic nerve stimulation in CRT patients and benefits of electronic lead repositioning: the ERACE trial.
    Goetze S; Defaye P; Bauer A; Merkel M; Bizeau O; Treusch S; Contzen K; Juenger C; Winter J;
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2013 Oct; 38(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23868567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Occurrence of phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: the role of left ventricular lead type and placement site.
    Biffi M; Exner DV; Crossley GH; Ramza B; Coutu B; Tomassoni G; Kranig W; Li S; Kristiansen N; Voss F
    Europace; 2013 Jan; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 22848075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness and Reliability of Selected Site Pacing for Avoidance of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in CRT Patients with Quadripolar LV Leads: The EffaceQ Study.
    Oswald H; Asbach S; Köbe J; Weglage H; Schulte-Pitzke B; Brachmann J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 38(8):942-50. PubMed ID: 25974406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of pacing configurations, body mass index, and position of coronary sinus lead on frequency of phrenic nerve stimulation and pacing thresholds under cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Seifert M; Schau T; Moeller V; Neuss M; Meyhoefer J; Butter C
    Europace; 2010 Jul; 12(7):961-7. PubMed ID: 20444725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical efficacy of left ventricular pacing vector programmability in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator patients for management of phrenic nerve stimulation and/or elevated left ventricular pacing thresholds: insights from the Efface Phrenic Stim study.
    Klein N; Klein M; Weglage H; Przibille O; Fischer S; Trappe HJ; Birkenhauer F; Pfeiffer D;
    Europace; 2012 Jun; 14(6):826-32. PubMed ID: 22277645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of different pacing strategies to minimize phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Huizar JF; Kaszala K; Koneru JN; Thacker LR; Ellenbogen KA
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1008-14. PubMed ID: 23621543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elimination of phrenic nerve stimulation occurring during CRT: follow-up in patients implanted with a novel quadripolar pacing lead.
    Mehta PA; Shetty AK; Squirrel M; Bostock J; Rinaldi CA
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 21833513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short-spaced dipole for managing phrenic nerve stimulation in patients with CRT: the "phrenic nerve mapping and stimulation EP" catheter study.
    Biffi M; Zanon F; Bertaglia E; Padeletti L; Varbaro A; De Santo T; Boriani G; Yang Z;
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Jan; 10(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 23063865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivered Via a Multipolar Left Ventricular Lead is Associated with Reduced Mortality and Elimination of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Follow-Up from a Multicenter Registry.
    Behar JM; Bostock J; Zhu Li AP; Chin HM; Jubb S; Lent E; Gamble J; Foley PW; Betts TR; Rinaldi CA; Herring N
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 May; 26(5):540-6. PubMed ID: 25631303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Application and efficacy of the adjustment on left ventricular electrical delay and the distance between right and left ventricular pacing polar in optimizing the left ventricular pacing polar].
    Yan XL; Liang YC; Yu HB; Xu BG; Gao Y; Liu R; Xu GQ; Wu M
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 48(8):669-674. PubMed ID: 32847323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Moubarak G; Bouzeman A; Ollitrault J; Anselme F; Cazeau S
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2014 Oct; 41(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 24934757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postoperative performance of the Quartet® left ventricular heart lead.
    Tomassoni G; Baker J; Corbisiero R; Love C; Martin D; Niazi I; Sheppard R; Worley S; Beau S; Greer GS; Aryana A; Cao M; Harbert N; Zhang S;
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 23339555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy may predict late phrenic nerve stimulation.
    Juliá J; López-Gil M; Fontenla A; Lozano Á; Villagraz L; Salguero R; Arribas F
    Europace; 2018 Sep; 20(9):1498-1505. PubMed ID: 29182757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Right ventricular septal pacing as alternative for failed left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates.
    Alhous MH; Small GR; Hannah A; Hillis GS; Frenneaux M; Broadhurst PA
    Europace; 2015 Jan; 17(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 25359384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phrenic nerve stimulation with the quadripolar left ventricular lead not overcome by 'electronic repositioning'.
    Kirubakaran S; Rinaldi CA
    Europace; 2012 Apr; 14(4):608-9. PubMed ID: 22094452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Wireless Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing: The SELECT-LV Study.
    Reddy VY; Miller MA; Neuzil P; Søgaard P; Butter C; Seifert M; Delnoy PP; van Erven L; Schalji M; Boersma LVA; Riahi S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 May; 69(17):2119-2129. PubMed ID: 28449772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of QRS duration on outcome of death or appropriate defibrillator therapy by strategy of left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients.
    Saba S; Marek J; Alam MB; Adelstein E; Schwartzman D; Jain S; Gorcsan J
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2014 Dec; 41(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 25391355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes.
    Forleo GB; Della Rocca DG; Papavasileiou LP; Molfetta AD; Santini L; Romeo F
    Heart Rhythm; 2011 Jan; 8(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 20887804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preventing phrenic nerve stimulation by a patch insulation in an intact swine heart model.
    Huang JL; Lin YJ; Hung YW; Hsieh YC; Cheng CM; Wang KY
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e102608. PubMed ID: 25033271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of a quadripolar left ventricular lead to achieve successful implantation in patients with previous failed attempts at cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Shetty AK; Duckett SG; Bostock J; Rosenthal E; Rinaldi CA
    Europace; 2011 Jul; 13(7):992-6. PubMed ID: 21343237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.