BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23868833)

  • 1. The efficacy and safety of an office-based polypectomy with a vacuum-powered microdebrider.
    Gan EC; Habib AR; Hathorn I; Javer AR
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2013 Nov; 3(11):890-5. PubMed ID: 23868833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. RESOLVE: a randomized, controlled, blinded study of bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants for in-office treatment of recurrent sinonasal polyposis.
    Han JK; Forwith KD; Smith TL; Kern RC; Brown WJ; Miller SK; Ow RA; Poetker DM; Karanfilov B; Matheny KE; Stambaugh J; Gawlicka AK
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2014 Nov; 4(11):861-70. PubMed ID: 25266981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of outcomes of simple polypectomy plus balloon catheter dilatation versus functional endoscopic sinus surgery in nasal polyposis: a preliminary study.
    Bozdemir K; Kutluhan A; Çetin H; Yalçıner G; Bilgen AS
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2011; 25(3):198-200. PubMed ID: 21679533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Steroid-eluting sinus implant for in-office treatment of recurrent nasal polyposis: a prospective, multicenter study.
    Lavigne F; Miller SK; Gould AR; Lanier BJ; Romett JL
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2014 May; 4(5):381-9. PubMed ID: 24599580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of coblation polypectomy on estimated blood loss in endoscopic sinus surgery.
    Eloy JA; Walker TJ; Casiano RR; Ruiz JW
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2009; 23(5):535-9. PubMed ID: 19493385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The microdebrider, a step forward or an expensive gadget?
    Cornet ME; Reinartz SM; Georgalas C; van Spronsen E; Fokkens WJ
    Rhinology; 2012 Jun; 50(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 22616081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bipolar microdebrider may reduce intraoperative blood loss and operating time during nasal polyp surgery.
    Kumar N; Sindwani R
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2012 Aug; 91(8):336-44. PubMed ID: 22930083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Powered nasal polypectomy in the office setting.
    Krouse JH; Christmas DA
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1996 Sep; 75(9):608-10. PubMed ID: 8870366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Microdebrider polypectomy and local corticosteroids].
    Deloire C; Brugel-Ribère L; Peynègre R; Rugina M; Coste A; Papon JF
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2007 Nov; 124(5):232-8. PubMed ID: 17678869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The use of hypertonic sea-water solution in patients after surgery of the nose and paranasal sinuses].
    Rapiejko P; Jurkiewicz D
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2010; 64(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 20476589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Sinonasal Polyposis: Microdebrider or Conventional Instruments.
    Lageju N; Pradhan B; Thapa N
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2017; 56(208):447-50. PubMed ID: 29453478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic sinus surgery in the management of nasal obstruction.
    Tan BK; Lane AP
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2009 Apr; 42(2):227-40, vii. PubMed ID: 19328888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety, feasibility, and efficacy of placement of steroid-eluting bioabsorbable sinus implants in the office setting: a prospective case series.
    Matheny KE; Carter KB; Tseng EY; Fong KJ
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2014 Oct; 4(10):808-15. PubMed ID: 25224654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In-office endoscopic nasal polypectomy: prospective analysis of patient tolerability and efficacy.
    Viera-Artiles J; Corriols-Noval P; López-Simón E; González-Aguado R; Lobo D; Megía R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Dec; 277(12):3341-3348. PubMed ID: 32666295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of Endoscopic Polypectomy in Clinic compared to Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A modelling study.
    Kumar S; Thavorn K; van Katwyk S; Lasso A; Kilty SJ
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2020 Jul; 45(4):477-485. PubMed ID: 32227591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of powered instrumentation in out-patient revisional sinus surgery.
    Kühnel T; Hosemann W; Rothammer R
    Rhinology; 2001 Dec; 39(4):215-9. PubMed ID: 11826692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The microdébrider and its complications in endoscopic surgery for nasal polyposis.
    Ecevit MC; Sutay S; Erdag TK
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Apr; 37(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 19128605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the microdebrider and standard instruments in endoscopic sinus surgery: a double-blind randomised study.
    Sauer M; Lemmens W; Vauterin T; Jorissen M
    B-ENT; 2007; 3(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17451119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of a Lateral Nasal Wall Block Technique for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Under Local Anesthesia.
    Scott GM; Diamond C; Micomonaco DC
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2018 Jul; 32(4):318-322. PubMed ID: 29683003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microdebriders used in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: secondary analysis and validation of a new tissue model.
    Dave SP; Polak M; Casiano RR
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Sep; 115(9):1641-5. PubMed ID: 16148710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.