148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23869356)
1. Effects of implant system, impression technique, and impression material on accuracy of the working cast.
Wegner K; Weskott K; Zenginel M; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(4):989-95. PubMed ID: 23869356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of various impression materials and methods for two implant systems: An effect size study.
Schmidt A; Häussling T; Rehmann P; Schaaf H; Wöstmann B
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 29191609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of impression technique and material on the accuracy of multiple implant impressions.
Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 18717085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations.
Fernandez MA; Paez de Mendoza CY; Platt JA; Levon JA; Hovijitra ST; Nimmo A
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 23387412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials.
Buzayan M; Baig MR; Yunus N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 24278919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments.
Eliasson A; Ortorp A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e30-8. PubMed ID: 21453396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch.
Tan MY; Yee SHX; Wong KM; Tan YH; Tan KBC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):366–380. PubMed ID: 30521661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional accuracy of plastic transfer impression copings for three implant systems.
Teo JW; Tan KB; Nicholls JI; Wong KM; Uy J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 24818195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants.
Reddy S; Prasad K; Vakil H; Jain A; Chowdhary R
Niger J Clin Pract; 2013; 16(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 23771446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.
Menini M; Setti P; Pera F; Pera P; Pesce P
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 28965251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
Sorrentino R; Gherlone EF; Calesini G; Zarone F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of impression material and time on the 3-dimensional accuracy of implant impressions.
Holst S; Blatz MB; Bergler M; Goellner M; Wichmann M
Quintessence Int; 2007 Jan; 38(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 17216911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant.
Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of three-dimensional distortion of two impression materials in the transfer of dental implants.
Aguilar ML; Elias A; Vizcarrondo CE; Psoter WJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):202-9. PubMed ID: 20362763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
