173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23869357)
1. A comparison of precision of fit, rotational freedom, and torque loss with copy-milled zirconia and prefabricated titanium abutments.
Alikhasi M; Monzavi A; Bassir SH; Naini RB; Khosronedjad N; Keshavarz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(4):996-1002. PubMed ID: 23869357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of fit accuracy and torque maintenance of zirconia and titanium abutments for internal tri-channel and external-hex implant connections.
Siadat H; Beyabanaki E; Mousavi N; Alikhasi M
J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 9(4):271-277. PubMed ID: 28874994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of fracture resistance and fit accuracy of customized zirconia abutments with prefabricated zirconia abutments in internal hexagonal implants.
Park JI; Lee Y; Lee JH; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Oct; 15(5):769-78. PubMed ID: 22236163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The behavior of a zirconia or metal abutment on the implant-abutment interface during cyclic loading.
Queiroz DA; Hagee N; Lee DJ; Zheng F
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):211-216. PubMed ID: 31810616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.
Smith NA; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 24656409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro evaluation of titanium, zirconia, and alumina procera abutments with hexagonal connection.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 16955608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.
Sailer I; Asgeirsson AG; Thoma DS; Fehmer V; Aspelund T; Özcan M; Pjetursson BE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 29527740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stiffness, strength, and failure modes of implant-supported monolithic lithium disilicate crowns: influence of titanium and zirconia abutments.
Joda T; Bürki A; Bethge S; Brägger U; Zysset P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1272-9. PubMed ID: 26574852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental research on the relationship between fit accuracy and fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.
Sui X; Wei H; Wang D; Han Y; Deng J; Wang Y; Wang J; Yang J
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1353-9. PubMed ID: 24561040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant Volume Loss, Misfit, Screw Loosening, and Stress In Custom Titanium and Zirconia Abutments.
Barbosa SA; Bacchi A; Barão VAR; Silva-Souza YT; Bruniera JF; Caldas RA; Consani RLX
Braz Dent J; 2020 Sep; 31(4):374-379. PubMed ID: 32901712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vertical Misfit of Single-Implant Abutments Made from Different Materials Under Cyclic Loading.
Butignon LE; de Almeida Basílio M; Santo JS; Arioli Filho JN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1017-22. PubMed ID: 27632255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical properties and marginal fit of prefabricated versus customized dental implant abutments: A comparative study.
Ma M; Li X; Zou L; He J; Zhao B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 24(5):720-729. PubMed ID: 36043699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal accuracy of three implant-ceramic abutment configurations.
Baldassarri M; Hjerppe J; Romeo D; Fickl S; Thompson VP; Stappert CF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):537-43. PubMed ID: 22616046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of fatigue loading on the screw joint stability of zirconium abutment.
Tsumita M; Kokubo Y; Kano T; Sasaki K
J Prosthodont Res; 2013 Jul; 57(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 23796911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of customized cobalt-chromium abutments fabricated with different manufacturing process versus titanium stock abutments on the marginal misfit -An
Sutradhar W; Mishra SK; Chowdhary R
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(3):225-232. PubMed ID: 36511051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.
Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-Dimensional Displacement of Nine Different Abutments for an Implant with an Internal Hexagon Platform.
Gilbert AB; Yilmaz B; Seidt JD; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL; Chien HH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(4):781-8. PubMed ID: 26252029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Custom Morse taper zirconia abutments: Influence on marginal fit and torque loss before and after thermomechanical cycling.
Moris ICM; Faria ACL; Ribeiro RF; Fok AS; Rodrigues RCS
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Feb; 78():241-245. PubMed ID: 29179039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fits of Implant Zirconia Custom Abutments and Frameworks: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.
Abduo J; Yin L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):99–114. PubMed ID: 30282084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
