These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23869365)

  • 1. In vitro radiographic detection of cement overhangs on cement-retained implant restorations.
    Antonijevic D; Obradovic-Djuricic K; Rakocevic Z; Medigovic I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(4):1068-75. PubMed ID: 23869365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A descriptive study of the radiographic density of implant restorative cements.
    Wadhwani C; Hess T; Faber T; Piñeyro A; Chen CS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 20416413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
    Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
    Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the radiopacity of luting cements by digital radiography.
    Altintas SH; Yildirim T; Kayipmaz S; Usumez A
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 23107317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
    Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of implant abutment modification on the extrusion of excess cement at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant restorations.
    Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Hess T; Zhang H; Chung KH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 22167429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
    Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of conventional and digital radiography capacities for distinguishing dental materials on radiograms depending on the present radiopacifying agent.
    Antonijević D; Ilić D; Medić V; Dodić S; Obradović-Djuriĉić K; Rakoĉević Z
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Nov; 71(11):1006-12. PubMed ID: 25536802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strain analysis of 9 different abutments for cement-retained crowns on an internal hexagonal implant.
    Salaita LG; Yilmaz B; Seidt JD; Clelland NL; Chien HH; McGlumphy EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Aug; 118(2):166-171. PubMed ID: 28126354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of height and surface roughness of abutments and the type of cement on bond strength of cement-retained implant restorations.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Abu-Sitta EH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jun; 22(6):638-44. PubMed ID: 21039897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of the emergence profile on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant reconstructions.
    Sancho-Puchades M; Crameri D; Özcan M; Sailer I; Jung RE; Hämmerle CHF; Thoma DS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1515-1522. PubMed ID: 28407306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiopacity of portland cement associated with different radiopacifying agents.
    Húngaro Duarte MA; de Oliveira El Kadre GD; Vivan RR; Guerreiro Tanomaru JM; Tanomaru Filho M; de Moraes IG
    J Endod; 2009 May; 35(5):737-40. PubMed ID: 19410095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement. A prospective clinical study.
    Linkevicius T; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L; Maslova N; Puriene A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jan; 24(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 22487018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Techniques to minimize excess luting agent in cement-retained implant restorations.
    Dumbrigue HB; Abanomi AA; Cheng LL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jan; 87(1):112-4. PubMed ID: 11807495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A method for registering the abutment screw position of cement-retained implant restorations.
    Figueras-Alvarez O; Cedeño R; Cano-Batalla J; Cabratosa-Termes J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jul; 104(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 20620369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention of luting agents on implant abutments of different height and taper.
    Bresciano M; Schierano G; Manzella C; Screti A; Bignardi C; Preti G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):594-8. PubMed ID: 16164467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiopacity of Composite Luting Cements Using a Digital Technique.
    Dukic W
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e450-e459. PubMed ID: 28072486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.