These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23869850)

  • 21. Strength comparison of four techniques to secure implant attachment housings to complete dentures.
    Domingo KB; Burgess JO; Litaker MS; McCracken MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jul; 110(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23849608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of pre-processing methods on bond strength between acrylic resin teeth and acrylic denture base resin.
    Kurt M; Saraç YŞ; Ural C; Saraç D
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e357-62. PubMed ID: 21564271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of various frequencies of ultrasonic cleaner in reducing residual monomer in acrylic resin.
    Charasseangpaisarn T; Wiwatwarrapan C
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Dec; 63():163-7. PubMed ID: 26190059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development and application of methods for determination of residual monomer in dental acrylic resins using high performance liquid chromatography.
    Urban VM; Cass QB; Oliveira RV; Giampaolo ET; Machado AL
    Biomed Chromatogr; 2006 Apr; 20(4):369-76. PubMed ID: 16177959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of wetting ability of five new saliva substitutes on heat-polymerized acrylic resin for retention of complete dentures in dry mouth patients: a comparative study.
    Mohsin AHB; Reddy V; Kumar P; Raj J; Babu SS
    Pan Afr Med J; 2017; 27():185. PubMed ID: 29187918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Minimization of the inevitable residual monomer in denture base acrylic.
    Lung CY; Darvell BW
    Dent Mater; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1119-28. PubMed ID: 16040111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Location of the allergenic monomer in warm-polymerized acrylic dentures. Part II: Experiments aimed at establishing guidelines for production of acrylic dentures suited for patients allergic to acrylic monomer and complementary investigations.
    Fernström AI; Oquist G
    Swed Dent J; 1980; 4(6):253-60. PubMed ID: 7010654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fracture force, deflection, and toughness of acrylic denture repairs involving glass fiber reinforcement.
    Kostoulas I; Kavoura VT; Frangou MJ; Polyzois GL
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 18086141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of the linear dimensional accuracy of denture bases cured the by conventional method and by the new press technique.
    Abby A; Kumar R; Shibu J; Chakravarthy R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 21891885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Repair strength of hypoallergenic denture base materials.
    Pfeiffer P; An N; Schmage P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):292-301. PubMed ID: 18922258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The influence of heat/pressure polymerization method on the adaptation of complete denture base].
    Wang YH; Zhang JZ; Pan J
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Aug; 15(4):419-22. PubMed ID: 16955172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of curing cycle on the tensile strength of the bond between heat cured denture base acrylic resin and acrylic resin denture teeth.
    Dalal A; Juszczyk AS; Radford DR; Clark RK
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2009 Dec; 17(4):146-9. PubMed ID: 20158054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of different curing temperatures on the distortion at the posterior peripheral seal: an in vitro study.
    Pasam N; Hallikerimath RB; Arora A; Gilra S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 23059563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Linear dimensional change of heat-cured acrylic resin complete dentures after reline and rebase.
    Pow EH; Chow TW; Clark RK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Aug; 80(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 9710829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of chemical surface treatments of different denture base resins on the shear bond strength of denture repair.
    Sarac YS; Sarac D; Kulunk T; Kulunk S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 16126078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Identification and quantification of leachable substances from polymer-based orthodontic base-plate materials.
    Kopperud HM; Kleven IS; Wellendorf H
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20624754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparative evaluation of the dimensional accuracy of heat polymerized acrylic resin denture base clamped by the conventional method and by new-press technique and cured by long curing cycle: an in vitro study.
    Shankar T; Gowd S; Ahmed ST; Vinod V; Goud MV; Rao NV
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):842-9. PubMed ID: 23404014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative effect of different polymerization techniques on residual monomer and hardness properties of PMMA-based denture resins.
    Ayaz EA; Durkan R; Koroglu A; Bagis B
    J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2014 Dec; 12(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 25199069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of reline material and denture base surface treatment on the impact strength of a denture base acrylic resin.
    da Cruz Perez LE; Machado AL; Canevarolo SV; Vergani CE; Giampaolo ET; Pavarina AC
    Gerodontology; 2010 Mar; 27(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 19371387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do CAD/CAM dentures really release less monomer than conventional dentures?
    Steinmassl PA; Wiedemair V; Huck C; Klaunzer F; Steinmassl O; Grunert I; Dumfahrt H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1697-1705. PubMed ID: 27704295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.