323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23870108)
1. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of denosumab for the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumours.
Ford J; Cummins E; Sharma P; Elders A; Stewart F; Johnston R; Royle P; Jones R; Mulatero C; Todd R; Mowatt G
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Jul; 17(29):1-386. PubMed ID: 23870108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic evaluation of denosumab compared with zoledronic acid in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.
Xie J; Namjoshi M; Wu EQ; Parikh K; Diener M; Yu AP; Guo A; Culver KW
J Manag Care Pharm; 2011 Oct; 17(8):621-43. PubMed ID: 21942303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab vs zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with solid tumors and bone metastases in the United States.
Stopeck A; Rader M; Henry D; Danese M; Halperin M; Cong Z; Qian Y; Dansey R; Chung K
J Med Econ; 2012; 15(4):712-23. PubMed ID: 22409231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bisphosphonates or RANK-ligand-inhibitors for men with prostate cancer and bone metastases: a network meta-analysis.
Jakob T; Tesfamariam YM; Macherey S; Kuhr K; Adams A; Monsef I; Heidenreich A; Skoetz N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Dec; 12(12):CD013020. PubMed ID: 33270906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bisphosphonates and other bone agents for breast cancer.
Wong MH; Stockler MR; Pavlakis N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; (2):CD003474. PubMed ID: 22336790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Which Bone-Modifying Agent is Associated with Better Outcomes in Patients with Skeletal Metastases from Lung Cancer? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Bozzo A; Deng J; Abbas U; Bhasin R; Deodat M; Wariach S; Sanger S; Axelrod D; Masrouha K; Turcotte R; Wilson D; Ghert M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Sep; 479(9):2047-2057. PubMed ID: 33835092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Zoledronic acid: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of bone metastases.
McKeage K; Plosker GL
Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(3):251-68. PubMed ID: 18282018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review and economic evaluation of bisphosphonates for the prevention of fragility fractures.
Davis S; Martyn-St James M; Sanderson J; Stevens J; Goka E; Rawdin A; Sadler S; Wong R; Campbell F; Stevenson M; Strong M; Selby P; Gittoes N
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Oct; 20(78):1-406. PubMed ID: 27801641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with solid tumors and bone metastases in the United States.
Stopeck A; Brufsky A; Kennedy L; Bhatta S; Bhowmik D; Buchanan J; Despiegel N; Hechmati G
J Med Econ; 2020 Jan; 23(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 31364885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Denosumab for treatment of bone metastases secondary to solid tumours: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Ford JA; Jones R; Elders A; Mulatero C; Royle P; Sharma P; Stewart F; Todd R; Mowatt G
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Jan; 49(2):416-30. PubMed ID: 22906748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Denosumab, raloxifene, romosozumab and teriparatide to prevent osteoporotic fragility fractures: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Davis S; Simpson E; Hamilton J; James MM; Rawdin A; Wong R; Goka E; Gittoes N; Selby P
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Jun; 24(29):1-314. PubMed ID: 32588816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analysis comparing denosumab and zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced solid tumours.
Zheng GZ; Chang B; Lin FX; Xie D; Hu QX; Yu GY; Du SX; Li XD
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2017 Nov; 26(6):. PubMed ID: 27430483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Snedecor SJ; Carter JA; Kaura S; Botteman MF
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 22870908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pharmacoeconomics of bisphosphonates for skeletal-related event prevention in metastatic non-breast solid tumours.
Carter JA; Joshi AD; Kaura S; Botteman MF
Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 May; 30(5):373-86. PubMed ID: 22500986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cost-effectiveness analysis of denosumab for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma in the United States of America.
Raje N; Roodman GD; Willenbacher W; Shimizu K; García-Sanz R; Terpos E; Kennedy L; Sabatelli L; Intorcia M; Hechmati G
J Med Econ; 2018 May; 21(5):525-536. PubMed ID: 29480139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the management of skeletal metastases secondary to breast cancer.
Snedecor SJ; Carter JA; Kaura S; Botteman MF
Clin Ther; 2012 Jun; 34(6):1334-49. PubMed ID: 22578308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bisphosphonates and other bone agents for breast cancer.
O'Carrigan B; Wong MH; Willson ML; Stockler MR; Pavlakis N; Goodwin A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Oct; 10(10):CD003474. PubMed ID: 29082518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus zoledronic acid for preventing skeletal-related events in the Czech Republic.
Cristino J; Finek J; Jandova P; Kolek M; Pásztor B; Giannopoulou C; Qian Y; Brezina T; Lothgren M
J Med Econ; 2017 Aug; 20(8):799-812. PubMed ID: 28485692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab compared with zoledronic acid in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases.
Xie J; Diener M; Sorg R; Wu EQ; Namjoshi M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2012 Aug; 12(4):247-58. PubMed ID: 22694824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing the burden of bone metastases: current concepts and treatment options.
von Moos R; Sternberg C; Body JJ; Bokemeyer C
Support Care Cancer; 2013 Jun; 21(6):1773-83. PubMed ID: 23468364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
