These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23871252)

  • 1. Characterization of fecal concentrations in human and other animal sources by physical, culture-based, and quantitative real-time PCR methods.
    Ervin JS; Russell TL; Layton BA; Yamahara KM; Wang D; Sassoubre LM; Cao Y; Kelty CA; Sivaganesan M; Boehm AB; Holden PA; Weisberg SB; Shanks OC
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6873-82. PubMed ID: 23871252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of forty-one microbial source tracking methods: a twenty-seven lab evaluation study.
    Boehm AB; Van De Werfhorst LC; Griffith JF; Holden PA; Jay JA; Shanks OC; Wang D; Weisberg SB
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6812-28. PubMed ID: 23880218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of PCR and quantitative real-time PCR methods for the characterization of ruminant and cattle fecal pollution sources.
    Raith MR; Kelty CA; Griffith JF; Schriewer A; Wuertz S; Mieszkin S; Gourmelon M; Reischer GH; Farnleitner AH; Ervin JS; Holden PA; Ebentier DL; Jay JA; Wang D; Boehm AB; Aw TG; Rose JB; Balleste E; Meijer WG; Sivaganesan M; Shanks OC
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6921-8. PubMed ID: 23871256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bacteroidales terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) for fecal source differentiation in comparison to and in combination with universal bacteria TRFLP.
    Cao Y; Van De Werfhorst LC; Scott EA; Raith MR; Holden PA; Griffith JF
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6944-55. PubMed ID: 23880219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbial Source Tracking Using Quantitative and Digital PCR To Identify Sources of Fecal Contamination in Stormwater, River Water, and Beach Water in a Great Lakes Area of Concern.
    Staley ZR; Boyd RJ; Shum P; Edge TA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 84(20):. PubMed ID: 30097445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of human fecal anaerobe-associated PCR-based assays in a multi-laboratory method evaluation study.
    Layton BA; Cao Y; Ebentier DL; Hanley K; Ballesté E; Brandão J; Byappanahalli M; Converse R; Farnleitner AH; Gentry-Shields J; Gidley ML; Gourmelon M; Lee CS; Lee J; Lozach S; Madi T; Meijer WG; Noble R; Peed L; Reischer GH; Rodrigues R; Rose JB; Schriewer A; Sinigalliano C; Srinivasan S; Stewart J; Van De Werfhorst LC; Wang D; Whitman R; Wuertz S; Jay J; Holden PA; Boehm AB; Shanks O; Griffith JF
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6897-908. PubMed ID: 23992621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enterococcus and Escherichia coli fecal source apportionment with microbial source tracking genetic markers--is it feasible?
    Wang D; Farnleitner AH; Field KG; Green HC; Shanks OC; Boehm AB
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6849-61. PubMed ID: 23890872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multi-laboratory evaluations of the performance of Catellicoccus marimammalium PCR assays developed to target gull fecal sources.
    Sinigalliano CD; Ervin JS; Van De Werfhorst LC; Badgley BD; Ballesté E; Bartkowiak J; Boehm AB; Byappanahalli M; Goodwin KD; Gourmelon M; Griffith J; Holden PA; Jay J; Layton B; Lee C; Lee J; Meijer WG; Noble R; Raith M; Ryu H; Sadowsky MJ; Schriewer A; Wang D; Wanless D; Whitman R; Wuertz S; Santo Domingo JW
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6883-96. PubMed ID: 23916157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Microbial and Chemical Source Tracking Markers To Identify Fecal Contamination Sources in the Humber River (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and Associated Storm Water Outfalls.
    Staley ZR; Grabuski J; Sverko E; Edge TA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 82(21):6357-6366. PubMed ID: 27542934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance evaluation of canine-associated Bacteroidales assays in a multi-laboratory comparison study.
    Schriewer A; Goodwin KD; Sinigalliano CD; Cox AM; Wanless D; Bartkowiak J; Ebentier DL; Hanley KT; Ervin J; Deering LA; Shanks OC; Peed LA; Meijer WG; Griffith JF; SantoDomingo J; Jay JA; Holden PA; Wuertz S
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6909-20. PubMed ID: 23916711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of molecular community analysis methods for discerning fecal sources and human waste.
    Cao Y; Van De Werfhorst LC; Dubinsky EA; Badgley BD; Sadowsky MJ; Andersen GL; Griffith JF; Holden PA
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6862-72. PubMed ID: 23880215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of new host-specific Bacteroides qPCRs for the identification of fecal contamination sources in water.
    Gómez-Doñate M; Casanovas-Massana A; Muniesa M; Blanch AR
    Microbiologyopen; 2016 Feb; 5(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 26763626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative microbial source tracking methods for identification of fecal contamination sources at Sunnyside Beach in the Toronto region area of concern.
    Staley ZR; Edge TA
    J Water Health; 2016 Oct; 14(5):839-850. PubMed ID: 27740549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concentrations of host-specific and generic fecal markers measured by quantitative PCR in raw sewage and fresh animal feces.
    Silkie SS; Nelson KL
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4860-71. PubMed ID: 19765792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distribution and Differential Survival of Traditional and Alternative Indicators of Fecal Pollution at Freshwater Beaches.
    Cloutier DD; McLellan SL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 83(4):. PubMed ID: 27940538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation and application of quantitative PCR assays using host-specific Bacteroidales genetic markers for swine fecal pollution tracking.
    Fan L; Shuai J; Zeng R; Mo H; Wang S; Zhang X; He Y
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Dec; 231(Pt 2):1569-1577. PubMed ID: 28967572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enterococcal Concentrations in a Coastal Ecosystem Are a Function of Fecal Source Input, Environmental Conditions, and Environmental Sources.
    Rothenheber D; Jones S
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 84(17):. PubMed ID: 30006393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data Acceptance Criteria for Standardized Human-Associated Fecal Source Identification Quantitative Real-Time PCR Methods.
    Shanks OC; Kelty CA; Oshiro R; Haugland RA; Madi T; Brooks L; Field KG; Sivaganesan M
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 May; 82(9):2773-2782. PubMed ID: 26921430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fecal source identification using random forest.
    Roguet A; Eren AM; Newton RJ; McLellan SL
    Microbiome; 2018 Oct; 6(1):185. PubMed ID: 30336775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of wild animal sources of fecal indicator bacteria by microbial source tracking (MST) influences regulatory decisions.
    Nguyen KH; Senay C; Young S; Nayak B; Lobos A; Conrad J; Harwood VJ
    Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():424-434. PubMed ID: 30059905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.