These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
871 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23871512)
1. Costs of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention. Amin AP; House JA; Safley DM; Chhatriwalla AK; Giersiefen H; Bremer A; Hamon M; Baklanov DV; Aluko A; Wohns D; Mathias DW; Applegate RA; Cohen DJ; Marso SP JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):827-34. PubMed ID: 23871512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Costs Associated With Access Site and Same-Day Discharge Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Evaluation of the Current Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Care Pathways in the United States. Amin AP; Patterson M; House JA; Giersiefen H; Spertus JA; Baklanov DV; Chhatriwalla AK; Safley DM; Cohen DJ; Rao SV; Marso SP JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 10(4):342-351. PubMed ID: 28231901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of costs between transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort analysis from the Premier research database. Safley DM; Amin AP; House JA; Baklanov D; Mills R; Giersiefen H; Bremer A; Marso SP Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):303-9.e2. PubMed ID: 23453097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Same versus next day discharge after elective transradial PCI: The RAdial SAme Day DischArge after PCI trial. (The RASADDA-PCI trial). Rodriguez-Araujo G; Cilingiroglu M; Mego D; Hakeem A; Lendel V; Cawich I; Paixao A; Marmagkiolis K; Flaherty P; Rollefson W Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Sep; 19(6S):7-11. PubMed ID: 29937383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Access Site Practice on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Thrombolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United Kingdom: An Insight From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Dataset. Rashid M; Rushton CA; Kwok CS; Kinnaird T; Kontopantelis E; Olier I; Ludman P; De Belder MA; Nolan J; Mamas MA JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 10(22):2258-2265. PubMed ID: 29169494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transradial intervention for patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction with or without cardiogenic shock. Fujii T; Masuda N; Ijichi T; Kamiyama Y; Tanaka S; Nakazawa G; Shinozaki N; Matsukage T; Ogata N; Ikari Y Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 83(1):E1-7. PubMed ID: 23441063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice? Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J; JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence. Lee MS; Wolfe M; Stone GW JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1149-52. PubMed ID: 24262614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Karrowni W; Vyas A; Giacomino B; Schweizer M; Blevins A; Girotra S; Horwitz PA JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):814-23. PubMed ID: 23968700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health Economic Analysis of Access Site Practice in England During Changes in Practice: Insights From the British Cardiovascular Interventional Society. Mamas MA; Tosh J; Hulme W; Hoskins N; Bungey G; Ludman P; de Belder M; Kwok CS; Verin N; Kinnaird T; Bennett E; Curzen N; Nolan J; Kontopantelis E Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2018 May; 11(5):e004482. PubMed ID: 29743163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility limits of transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction in the real life (TRAP-AMI). Gellen B; Lesault PF; Canouï-Poitrine F; Champagne S; Mouillet G; Pongas D; Le Thuaut A; Jakljevic T; Boudiche S; de la Vega M; Maalej A; Veugeois A; Dubois-Randé JL; Teiger E Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):1056-61. PubMed ID: 23159410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic use of transradial PCI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a call to "arms". Eleid MF; Rihal CS; Gulati R; Bell MR JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1145-8. PubMed ID: 24262613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies. Roule V; Lemaitre A; Sabatier R; Lognoné T; Dahdouh Z; Berger L; Milliez P; Grollier G; Montalescot G; Beygui F Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2015 Nov; 108(11):563-75. PubMed ID: 26365478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Costs and Benefits Associated With Transradial Versus Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China. Jin C; Li W; Qiao SB; Yang JG; Wang Y; He PY; Tang XR; Dong QT; Li XD; Yan HB; Wu YJ; Chen JL; Gao RL; Yuan JQ; Dou KF; Xu B; Zhao W; Zhang X; Xian Y; Yang YJ J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Apr; 5(4):. PubMed ID: 27107136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association of radial versus femoral access with contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Kolte D; Spence N; Puthawala M; Hyder O; Tuohy CP; Davidson CB; Sheldon MW; Laskey WK; Abbott JD Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):546-551. PubMed ID: 27566903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of contemporary vascular closure devices for the prevention of vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions in an all-comers PCI population. Kerré S; Kustermans L; Vandendriessche T; Bosmans J; Haine SE; Miljoen H; Vrints CJ; Beutels P; Wouters K; Claeys MJ EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24952056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost effectiveness of radial access for diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention. Applegate R; Sacrinty M; Schafer P; Smith J; Gandhi S; Kutcher M; Santos R; Cecile A; Little W Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 82(4):E375-84. PubMed ID: 23074085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transradial versus transfemoral approach in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: insight from the CREDO-Kyoto AMI registry. Yamashita Y; Shiomi H; Morimoto T; Yaku H; Kaji S; Furukawa Y; Nakagawa Y; Ando K; Kadota K; Abe M; Akao M; Nagao K; Shizuta S; Ono K; Kimura T; Heart Vessels; 2017 Dec; 32(12):1448-1457. PubMed ID: 28698995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost implications of intraprocedural thrombotic events and bleeding in percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from the CHAMPION PHOENIX ECONOMICS Study. Tamez H; Généreux P; Yeh RW; Amin AP; Fan W; White HD; Kirtane AJ; Stone GW; Gibson CM; Harrington RA; Bhatt DL; Pinto DS; Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Nov; 92(5):E348-E355. PubMed ID: 29726596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Elderly Patients in China: A Retrospective Analysis. Jin C; Xu Y; Qiao SB; Tang XR; Wu YJ; Yan HB; Dou KF; Xu B; Yang JG; Yang YJ Chin Med Sci J; 2017 Sep; 32(3):161-170. PubMed ID: 28956743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]