823 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23872649)
21. Transfemoral approach with systematic use of FemoSeal™ closure device compared to transradial approach in primary angioplasty.
Alonzo A; Rigattieri S; Giovannelli F; Di Russo C; Sciahbasi A; Berni A; Volpe M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):849-54. PubMed ID: 26104978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative Efficacy of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Schussler JM; Vasudevan A; von Bose LJ; Won JI; McCullough PA
Am J Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 118(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 27378143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach in Bypass Grafts.
Dai Y; Li C; Zhang F; Yang J; Chang S; Lu H; Yang H; Huang Z; Qian J; Ge L; Ge J
Angiology; 2018 Feb; 69(2):136-142. PubMed ID: 28602142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Safety and efficacy of adjuvant glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during primary percutaneous coronary intervention performed from the radial approach for acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Iqbal Z; Cohen M; Pollack C; Goldstein P; Zeymer U; Huber K; Barthelemy O; Cayla G; Aout M; Vicaut E; Montalescot G;
Am J Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 111(12):1727-33. PubMed ID: 23528027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Complete transitioning to the radial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a real-world single-center registry of 1808 consecutive patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Kedev S; Kalpak O; Dharma S; Antov S; Kostov J; Pejkov H; Spiroski I
J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Sep; 26(9):475-82. PubMed ID: 25198492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Results of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients ≥75 years treated by the transradial approach.
Rodriguez-Leor O; Fernandez-Nofrerias E; Carrillo X; Mauri J; Labata C; Oliete C; Rivas Mdel C; Bayes-Genis A
Am J Cardiol; 2014 Feb; 113(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 24315363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.
Lee MS; Wolfe M; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1149-52. PubMed ID: 24262614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prediction and impact of failure of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Abdelaal E; MacHaalany J; Plourde G; Barria Perez A; Bouchard MP; Roy M; Déry JP; Déry U; Barbeau G; Larose É; Gleeton O; Noël B; Rodés-Cabau J; Roy L; Costerousse O; Bertrand OF
Heart; 2016 Jun; 102(12):919-25. PubMed ID: 27030600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approach in treatment of chronic total occlusions with similar lesion characteristics.
Huyut MA; Yamaç AH
Anatol J Cardiol; 2018 May; 19(5):319-325. PubMed ID: 29724974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary interventions in elderly patients.
Secco GG; Marinucci L; Uguccioni L; Parisi R; Uguccioni S; Fattori R
J Invasive Cardiol; 2013 May; 25(5):254-6. PubMed ID: 23645052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Transradial versus transfemoral access for female patients who underwent primary PCI in STEMI: Two years follow-up data from acute STEMI interventional registry.
Kedev S; Sukmawan R; Kalpak O; Dharma S; Antov S; Kostov J; Pejkov H; Spiroski I
Int J Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 217 Suppl():S16-20. PubMed ID: 27372739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Arterial access site and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with and without vorapaxar.
Déry JP; Mahaffey KW; Tricoci P; White HD; Podder M; Westerhout CM; Moliterno DJ; Harrington RA; Chen E; Strony J; Van de Werf F; Ziada KM; Held C; Aylward PE; Armstrong PW; Rao SV
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug; 88(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 26698636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United kingdom.
Ratib K; Mamas MA; Anderson SG; Bhatia G; Routledge H; De Belder M; Ludman PF; Fraser D; Nolan J;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt A):20-9. PubMed ID: 25616814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients: a systematic overview and meta-analysis.
He P; Yang Y; Hu F
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(6):1110-7. PubMed ID: 24622444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A Transradial Approach of Cardiac Catheterization for Patients on Dialysis.
Kuno T; Hirano K; Imaeda S; Hashimoto K; Ryuzaki T; Saito T; Yamazaki H; Tabei R; Kodaira M; Numasawa Y
J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 30(6):212-217. PubMed ID: 29335385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Underutilization of Radial Access in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium.
Howe MJ; Seth M; Riba A; Hanzel G; Zainea M; Gurm HS
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 25922417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison between radial and femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of nonrandomized trials.
Ye Y; Zeng Y
Coron Artery Dis; 2019 Mar; 30(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 30531449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial.
Bernat I; Horak D; Stasek J; Mates M; Pesek J; Ostadal P; Hrabos V; Dusek J; Koza J; Sembera Z; Brtko M; Aschermann O; Smid M; Polansky P; Al Mawiri A; Vojacek J; Bis J; Costerousse O; Bertrand OF; Rokyta R
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Mar; 63(10):964-72. PubMed ID: 24211309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Rise of Transradial Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes in Australia.
Ocsan RJ; Doost A; Marley P; Farshid A
J Interv Cardiol; 2020; 2020():4397697. PubMed ID: 33312077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Use and outcome of radial versus femoral approach for primary PCI in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock: results from the ALKK PCI registry.
Bauer T; Hochadel M; Brachmann J; Schächinger V; Boekstegers P; Zrenner B; Zahn R; Zeymer U;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Oct; 86 Suppl 1():S8-14. PubMed ID: 25945803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
