319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23873034)
1. Quality assessment of ophthalmic questionnaires: review and recommendations.
Khadka J; McAlinden C; Pesudovs K
Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Aug; 90(8):720-44. PubMed ID: 23873034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient-reported Outcomes for Assessment of Quality of Life in Refractive Error: A Systematic Review.
Kandel H; Khadka J; Goggin M; Pesudovs K
Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Dec; 94(12):1102-1119. PubMed ID: 29095758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review.
Huang FF; Yang Q; Wang AN; Zhang JP
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Dec; 16(1):241. PubMed ID: 30591047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report.
Rothman M; Burke L; Erickson P; Leidy NK; Patrick DL; Petrie CD
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1075-83. PubMed ID: 19804437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient-reported outcome measures in amblyopia and strabismus: a systematic review.
Kumaran SE; Khadka J; Baker R; Pesudovs K
Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Jul; 101(4):460-484. PubMed ID: 28636173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methods to Develop the Eye-tem Bank to Measure Ophthalmic Quality of Life.
Khadka J; Fenwick E; Lamoureux E; Pesudovs K
Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Dec; 93(12):1485-1494. PubMed ID: 27668638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients With Rotator Cuff Disease.
Huang H; Grant JA; Miller BS; Mirza FM; Gagnier JJ
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2572-82. PubMed ID: 25622986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic literature review and assessment of patient-reported outcome instruments in sickle cell disease.
Sarri G; Bhor M; Abogunrin S; Farmer C; Nandal S; Halloway R; Revicki DA
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 May; 16(1):99. PubMed ID: 29784054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The reliability, validity, and preliminary responsiveness of the Eye Allergy Patient Impact Questionnaire (EAPIQ).
Alexander M; Berger W; Buchholz P; Walt J; Burk C; Lee J; Arbuckle R; Abetz L
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2005 Oct; 3():67. PubMed ID: 16259630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic review of psychometric testing of instruments that measure intention to work with older people.
Che CC; Hairi NN; Chong MC
J Adv Nurs; 2017 Sep; 73(9):2049-2064. PubMed ID: 28122163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Questionnaires for Measuring Refractive Surgery Outcomes.
Kandel H; Khadka J; Lundström M; Goggin M; Pesudovs K
J Refract Surg; 2017 Jun; 33(6):416-424. PubMed ID: 28586503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of activity limitations and participation restrictions with persons with chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review.
Vergauwen K; Huijnen IP; Kos D; Van de Velde D; van Eupen I; Meeus M
Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(19):1706-16. PubMed ID: 25365699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Ostomy-Q: Development and Psychometric Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Outcomes Associated with Ostomy Appliances.
Nafees B; Rasmussen M; LLoyd A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2017 Jan; 63(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 28112646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are patient-reported outcome instruments for ankylosing spondylitis fit for purpose for the axial spondyloarthritis patient? A qualitative and psychometric analysis.
van Tubergen A; Black PM; Coteur G
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2015 Oct; 54(10):1842-51. PubMed ID: 26001635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic review of meaning in life assessment instruments.
Brandstätter M; Baumann U; Borasio GD; Fegg MJ
Psychooncology; 2012 Oct; 21(10):1034-52. PubMed ID: 22232017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of EMPRO: a tool for the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcome measures.
Valderas JM; Ferrer M; Mendívil J; Garin O; Rajmil L; Herdman M; Alonso J;
Value Health; 2008; 11(4):700-8. PubMed ID: 18194398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic review of clinician-rated instruments to assess adults' levels of functioning in specialised public sector mental health services.
Burgess PM; Harris MG; Coombs T; Pirkis JE
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2017 Apr; 51(4):338-354. PubMed ID: 28118728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reengineering the glaucoma quality of life-15 questionnaire with rasch analysis.
Khadka J; Pesudovs K; McAlinden C; Vogel M; Kernt M; Hirneiss C
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(9):6971-7. PubMed ID: 21810983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefit finding in adult cancer populations: psychometric properties and performance of existing instruments.
Pascoe L; Edvardsson D
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2014 Oct; 18(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 24958640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
