These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23873210)

  • 1. The evaluation of the consistency of quantified assertions.
    Ragni M; Khemlani S; Johnson-Laird PN
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jan; 42(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 23873210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Immediate inferences from quantified assertions.
    Khemlani S; Lotstein M; Trafton JG; Johnson-Laird PN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):2073-96. PubMed ID: 25607245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Illusions in reasoning about consistency.
    Johnson-Laird PN; Legrenzi P; Girotto V; Legrenzi MS
    Science; 2000 Apr; 288(5465):531-2. PubMed ID: 10775114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modality, probability, and mental models.
    Hinterecker T; Knauff M; Johnson-Laird PN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1606-1620. PubMed ID: 26928480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. If and or: Real and counterfactual possibilities in their truth and probability.
    Byrne RMJ; Johnson-Laird PN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):760-780. PubMed ID: 31647286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Models of consistency.
    Legrenzi P; Girotto V; Johnson-Laird PN
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Mar; 14(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 12661674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Illusions in quantified reasoning: how to make the impossible seem possible, and vice versa.
    Yang Y; Johnson-Laird PN
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):452-65. PubMed ID: 10881562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reasoning about properties: A computational theory.
    Khemlani S; Johnson-Laird PN
    Psychol Rev; 2022 Mar; 129(2):289-312. PubMed ID: 34553967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reasoning from inconsistency to consistency.
    Johnson-Laird PN; Girotto V; Legrenzi P
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jul; 111(3):640-61. PubMed ID: 15250779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Logic, probability, and human reasoning.
    Johnson-Laird PN; Khemlani SS; Goodwin GP
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2015 Apr; 19(4):201-14. PubMed ID: 25770779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reasoners consider alternative causes in predictive and diagnostic reasoning.
    Aßfalg A; Klauer KC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2188-2208. PubMed ID: 30998074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reasoning about Durations.
    Kelly LJ; Khemlani S; Johnson-Laird PN
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 32(11):2103-2116. PubMed ID: 32812828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The negations of conjunctions, conditionals, and disjunctions.
    Khemlani S; Orenes I; Johnson-Laird PN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():1-7. PubMed ID: 24904998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Causality in thought.
    Sloman SA; Lagnado D
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2015 Jan; 66():223-47. PubMed ID: 25061673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Theories of the syllogism: A meta-analysis.
    Khemlani S; Johnson-Laird PN
    Psychol Bull; 2012 May; 138(3):427-57. PubMed ID: 22289108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The modulation of disjunctive assertions.
    Quelhas AC; Johnson-Laird PN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):703-717. PubMed ID: 26878158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conditionals: a theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference.
    Johnson-Laird PN; Byrne RM
    Psychol Rev; 2002 Oct; 109(4):646-78. PubMed ID: 12374323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reasoning strategies for suppositional deductions.
    Byrne RM; Handley SJ
    Cognition; 1997 Jan; 62(1):1-49. PubMed ID: 8997169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Naïve deontics: a theory of meaning, representation, and reasoning.
    Bucciarelli M; Johnson-Laird PN
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Mar; 50(2):159-93. PubMed ID: 15680143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Raising argument strength using negative evidence: a constraint on models of induction.
    Heussen D; Voorspoels W; Verheyen S; Storms G; Hampton JA
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Nov; 39(8):1496-507. PubMed ID: 21604094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.