These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23873406)
1. Primary prophylaxis with hematopoietic colony stimulating factor: insights from a Canadian cost-effectiveness analysis. Strassels SA; Dickson M; Norris LB; Bennett CL J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(15):1072-3. PubMed ID: 23873406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients. Lathia N; Isogai PK; De Angelis C; Smith TJ; Cheung M; Mittmann N; Hoch JS; Walker S J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(15):1078-85. PubMed ID: 23873405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cooper KL; Madan J; Whyte S; Stevenson MD; Akehurst RL BMC Cancer; 2011 Sep; 11():404. PubMed ID: 21943360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving CHOP chemotherapy treatment without adversely affecting their quality of life: cost-benefit and quality of life analysis. Lee S; Knox A; Zeng IS; Coomarasamy C; Blacklock H; Issa S Support Care Cancer; 2013 Mar; 21(3):841-6. PubMed ID: 22972488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia during cancer therapy. Bennett CL; Djulbegovic B; Norris LB; Armitage JO N Engl J Med; 2013 Mar; 368(12):1131-9. PubMed ID: 23514290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States. Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients. Puértolas I; Frutos Pérez-Surio A; Alcácera MA; Andrés R; Salvador MDT Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 74(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 29152672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ESMO recommendations for the application of hematopoietic growth factors. Greil R; Jost LM; Ann Oncol; 2005; 16 Suppl 1():i80-2. PubMed ID: 15888768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pegfilgrastim: a new therapy to prevent neutropenic fever. Bence AK; Adams VR J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash); 2002; 42(5):806-8. PubMed ID: 12269716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors used in clinical practice: PoloNord Registry-Based Cohort Italian Study. Fagnani D; Isa L; Verga MF; Nova P; Casartelli C; Filipazzi V; Danova M; Farina G; Pugliese P; Fava S; Bertolini A; Cimminiello C; Boracchi P; Marano G; Panzarino C; Tumori; 2014; 100(5):491-8. PubMed ID: 25343541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma and myeloma: an economic evaluation of the PALM Trial. Perrier L; Lefranc A; Pérol D; Quittet P; Schmidt-Tanguy A; Siani C; de Peretti C; Favier B; Biron P; Moreau P; Bay JO; Lissandre S; Jardin F; Espinouse D; Sebban C Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Apr; 11(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 23435861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomised phase II study of the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim after autologous stem cell transplant for lymphoma and myeloma (PALM study). Sebban C; Lefranc A; Perrier L; Moreau P; Espinouse D; Schmidt A; Kammoun L; Ghesquieres H; Ferlay C; Bay JO; Lissandre S; Pérol D; Michallet M; Quittet P Eur J Cancer; 2012 Mar; 48(5):713-20. PubMed ID: 22248711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany]. Sehouli J; Goertz A; Steinle T; Dubois R; Plesnila-Frank C; Lalla A; von Minckwitz G Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Mar; 135(9):385-9. PubMed ID: 20180162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Open-label, randomized study of pegfilgrastim vs. daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Grigg A; Solal-Celigny P; Hoskin P; Taylor K; McMillan A; Forstpointner R; Bacon P; Renwick J; Hiddemann W; Leuk Lymphoma; 2003 Sep; 44(9):1503-8. PubMed ID: 14565651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized phase-III study of the efficacy of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster Study Group. Welte K; Reiter A; Mempel K; Pfetsch M; Schwab G; Schrappe M; Riehm H Blood; 1996 Apr; 87(8):3143-50. PubMed ID: 8605328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Aapro MS; Bohlius J; Cameron DA; Dal Lago L; Donnelly JP; Kearney N; Lyman GH; Pettengell R; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Walewski J; Weber DC; Zielinski C; Eur J Cancer; 2011 Jan; 47(1):8-32. PubMed ID: 21095116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]