206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23873573)
1. Housing system and laying hen strain impacts on egg microbiology.
Jones DR; Anderson KE
Poult Sci; 2013 Aug; 92(8):2221-5. PubMed ID: 23873573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microbiological impact of three commercial laying hen housing systems.
Jones DR; Cox NA; Guard J; Fedorka-Cray PJ; Buhr RJ; Gast RK; Abdo Z; Rigsby LL; Plumblee JR; Karcher DM; Robison CI; Blatchford RA; Makagon MM
Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):544-51. PubMed ID: 25480737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of shell bacteria from unwashed and washed table eggs harvested from caged laying hens and cage-free floor-housed laying hens.
Hannah JF; Wilson JL; Cox NA; Cason JA; Bourassa DV; Musgrove MT; Richardson LJ; Rigsby LL; Buhr RJ
Poult Sci; 2011 Jul; 90(7):1586-93. PubMed ID: 21673176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hen genetic strain and extended cold storage influence on physical egg quality from cage-free aviary housing system.
Jones DR; Karcher DM; Regmi P; Robison CO; Gast RK
Poult Sci; 2018 Jul; 97(7):2347-2355. PubMed ID: 29617856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of housing environment and hen strain on egg production and egg quality as well as cloacal and eggshell microbiology in laying hens.
Sharma MK; McDaniel CD; Kiess AS; Loar RE; Adhikari P
Poult Sci; 2022 Feb; 101(2):101595. PubMed ID: 34933221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mineral content of eggs differs with hen strain, age, and rearing environment.
Heflin LE; Malheiros R; Anderson KE; Johnson LK; Raatz SK
Poult Sci; 2018 May; 97(5):1605-1613. PubMed ID: 29471499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens.
Singh R; Cheng KM; Silversides FG
Poult Sci; 2009 Feb; 88(2):256-64. PubMed ID: 19151338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of environmental and egg microbiology associated with conventional and free-range laying hen management.
Jones DR; Anderson KE; Musgrove MT
Poult Sci; 2011 Sep; 90(9):2063-8. PubMed ID: 21844274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of commercial housing systems and nutrient and energy intake on laying hen performance and egg quality parameters.
Karcher DM; Jones DR; Abdo Z; Zhao Y; Shepherd TA; Xin H
Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):485-501. PubMed ID: 25630672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Keel bone damage affects behavioral and physiological responses related to stress and fear in two strains of laying hens.
Wei H; Feng Y; Ding S; Nian H; Yu H; Zhao Q; Bao J; Zhang R
J Anim Sci; 2022 Apr; 100(4):. PubMed ID: 35275597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contamination of eggs by Salmonella Enteritidis in experimentally infected laying hens of four commercial genetic lines in conventional cages and enriched colony housing.
Gast RK; Regmi P; Guraya R; Jones DR; Anderson KE; Karcher DM
Poult Sci; 2019 Oct; 98(10):5023-5027. PubMed ID: 31028700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bacteriological contamination, dirt, and cracks of eggshells in furnished cages and noncage systems for laying hens: an international on-farm comparison.
De Reu K; Rodenburg TB; Grijspeerdt K; Messens W; Heyndrickx M; Tuyttens FA; Sonck B; Zoons J; Herman L
Poult Sci; 2009 Nov; 88(11):2442-8. PubMed ID: 19834098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the performance of Hy-Line Brown laying hens fed soybean or soybean-free diets using cage or free-range rearing systems.
Al-Ajeeli MN; Leyva-Jimenez H; Abdaljaleel RA; Jameel Y; Hashim MM; Archer G; Bailey CA
Poult Sci; 2018 Mar; 97(3):812-819. PubMed ID: 29272538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Colonization of internal organs by Salmonella Enteritidis in experimentally infected laying hens of four commercial genetic lines in conventional cages and enriched colony housing.
Gast RK; Regmi P; Guraya R; Jones DR; Anderson KE; Karcher DM
Poult Sci; 2019 Apr; 98(4):1785-1790. PubMed ID: 30535349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Production performance, use of nest box, and external appearance of two strains of laying hens kept in conventional and enriched cages.
Onbaşılar EE; Ünal N; Erdem E; Kocakaya A; Yaranoğlu B
Poult Sci; 2015 Apr; 94(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 25667426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparisons of bone properties and keel deformities between strains and housing systems in end-of-lay hens.
Regmi P; Nelson N; Steibel JP; Anderson KE; Karcher DM
Poult Sci; 2016 Oct; 95(10):2225-34. PubMed ID: 27433008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nest use and patterns of egg laying and damage by 4 strains of laying hens in an aviary system.
Villanueva S; Ali ABA; Campbell DLM; Siegford JM
Poult Sci; 2017 Sep; 96(9):3011-3020. PubMed ID: 28431049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Egg production and egg quality in free-range laying hens housed at different outdoor stocking densities.
Campbell DLM; Lee C; Hinch GN; Roberts JR
Poult Sci; 2017 Sep; 96(9):3128-3137. PubMed ID: 28431098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of the housing environment and laying hen strain on tibia and femur bone properties of different laying phases of Hy-Line hens.
Sharma MK; White D; Chen C; Kim WK; Adhikari P
Poult Sci; 2021 Mar; 100(3):100933. PubMed ID: 33518350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Saltbush (Atriplex nummularia and A. amnicola) as potential plants for free-range layer farms: consequences for layer performance, egg sensory qualities, and excreta moisture.
de Koning C; Barekatain R; Singh M; Drake K
Poult Sci; 2019 Oct; 98(10):4555-4564. PubMed ID: 31135917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
