These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23874567)

  • 41. Oscillation encoding of individual differences in speech perception.
    Jin Y; Díaz B; Colomer M; Sebastián-Gallés N
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e100901. PubMed ID: 24992269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Second Language Immersion Experience Could Help the Brain Response to Second Language Reading for Native Chinese Speakers.
    Wang C; Flemming K; Yang Z; Cortiana G; Lammert J; Rafat Y; Tao S; Joanisse MF
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 34(12):2311-2319. PubMed ID: 36122357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Training-induced brain activation and functional connectivity differentiate multi-talker and single-talker speech training.
    Deng Z; Chandrasekaran B; Wang S; Wong PCM
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2018 May; 151():1-9. PubMed ID: 29535043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Decoding articulatory and phonetic components of naturalistic continuous speech from the distributed language network.
    Thomas TM; Singh A; Bullock LP; Liang D; Morse CW; Scherschligt X; Seymour JP; Tandon N
    J Neural Eng; 2023 Aug; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 37487487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Electrophysiological correlates of phonological processing: a cross-linguistic study.
    Dehaene-Lambertz G; Dupoux E; Gout A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000 Jul; 12(4):635-47. PubMed ID: 10936916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Electrophysiological correlates of cross-linguistic semantic integration in hearing signers: N400 and LPC.
    Zachau S; Korpilahti P; Hämäläinen JA; Ervast L; Heinänen K; Suominen K; Lehtihalmes M; Leppänen PH
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jul; 59():57-73. PubMed ID: 24751994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Enhancement of gamma oscillations indicates preferential processing of native over foreign phonemic contrasts in infants.
    Ortiz-Mantilla S; Hämäläinen JA; Musacchia G; Benasich AA
    J Neurosci; 2013 Nov; 33(48):18746-54. PubMed ID: 24285881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Successful non-native speech perception is linked to frequency following response phase consistency.
    Omote A; Jasmin K; Tierney A
    Cortex; 2017 Aug; 93():146-154. PubMed ID: 28654816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Did you get the beat? Late proficient French-German learners extract strong-weak patterns in tonal but not in linguistic sequences.
    Schmidt-Kassow M; Rothermich K; Schwartze M; Kotz SA
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(1):568-76. PubMed ID: 20692349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Music training enhances the automatic neural processing of foreign speech sounds.
    Intartaglia B; White-Schwoch T; Kraus N; Schön D
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):12631. PubMed ID: 28974695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Interactions between speech perception and production during learning of novel phonemic categories.
    Baese-Berk MM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):981-1005. PubMed ID: 30976997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Speech Recognition in Nonnative versus Native English-Speaking College Students in a Virtual Classroom.
    Neave-DiToro D; Rubinstein A; Neuman AC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):404-414. PubMed ID: 28534731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evidence for language transfer leading to a perceptual advantage for non-native listeners.
    Chang CB; Mishler A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2700-10. PubMed ID: 23039462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Online EEG Classification of Covert Speech for Brain-Computer Interfacing.
    Sereshkeh AR; Trott R; Bricout A; Chau T
    Int J Neural Syst; 2017 Dec; 27(8):1750033. PubMed ID: 28830308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Electrophysiological and phonological change detection measures of auditory word processing in normal Persian-speaking children.
    Ziatabar Ahmadi SZ; Mahmoudian S; Ashayeri H; Allaeddini F; Farhadi M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 90():220-226. PubMed ID: 27729137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Perceptual development of phoneme contrasts: how sensitivity changes along acoustic dimensions that contrast phoneme categories.
    Heeren WF; Schouten ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2291-302. PubMed ID: 19062867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Native language shapes automatic neural processing of speech.
    Intartaglia B; White-Schwoch T; Meunier C; Roman S; Kraus N; Schön D
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():57-65. PubMed ID: 27263123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Perceptual assimilation and discrimination of non-native vowel contrasts.
    Tyler MD; Best CT; Faber A; Levitt AG
    Phonetica; 2014; 71(1):4-21. PubMed ID: 24923313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Learning to recognize speakers of a non-native language: implications for the functional organization of human auditory cortex.
    Perrachione TK; Wong PC
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1899-910. PubMed ID: 17258240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.