These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23874608)

  • 1. Is beauty in the face of the beholder?
    Laeng B; Vermeer O; Sulutvedt U
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e68395. PubMed ID: 23874608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating self and partner physical attractiveness.
    Swami V; Furnham A; Georgiades C; Pang L
    Body Image; 2007 Mar; 4(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 18089256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The self prefers itself? Self-referential versus parental standards in face attractiveness.
    Sulutvedt U; Laeng B
    PeerJ; 2014; 2():e595. PubMed ID: 25276508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discriminating males and unpredictable females: males differentiate self-similar facial cues more than females in the judgment of opposite-sex attractiveness.
    Zhuang JY; Zhang S; Xu J; Hu D
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e90493. PubMed ID: 24594644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preference for facial self-resemblance and attractiveness in human mate choice.
    Kocsor F; Rezneki R; Juhász S; Bereczkei T
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1263-70. PubMed ID: 21267643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gaze properties of women judging the attractiveness of masculine and feminine male faces.
    Burriss RP; Marcinkowska UM; Lyons MT
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Jan; 12(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 24401278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.
    Little AC; Burt DM; Penton-Voak IS; Perrett DI
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jan; 268(1462):39-44. PubMed ID: 12123296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of averageness on judgments of facial attractiveness: no own-age or own-sex advantage among children attending single-sex schools.
    Vingilis-Jaremko L; Maurer D; Gao X
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Apr; 120():1-16. PubMed ID: 24326246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prioritized Identification of Attractive and Romantic Partner Faces in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.
    Nakamura K; Arai S; Kawabata H
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Nov; 46(8):2327-2338. PubMed ID: 28695295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facialmetric similarities mediate mate choice: sexual imprinting on opposite-sex parents.
    Bereczkei T; Hegedus G; Hajnal G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Jan; 276(1654):91-8. PubMed ID: 18765339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.
    Dixson BJ; Sulikowski D; Gouda-Vossos A; Rantala MJ; Brooks RC
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 29(11):2311-2320. PubMed ID: 27488414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facial and self-report questionnaire measures capture different aspects of romantic partner preferences.
    South Palomares JK; Young AW
    Br J Psychol; 2019 Aug; 110(3):549-575. PubMed ID: 30270430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. (Pretty) Lady First: Effects of Mate-Related Motives on the Item-Selection Orders of Faces With Varying Attractiveness.
    Zhang Y; Li X; Li P; Jia X; Li W
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(1):1474704919834502. PubMed ID: 30889967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of men's beauty and attractiveness by women with low sexual desire.
    Ferdenzi C; Delplanque S; Vorontsova-Wenger O; Pool E; Bianchi-Demicheli F; Sander D
    J Sex Med; 2015 Apr; 12(4):946-55. PubMed ID: 25496510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human nonindependent mate choice: is model female attractiveness everything?
    Vakirtzis A; Roberts SC
    Evol Psychol; 2012 May; 10(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 22947636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An examination of accuracy and bias in perceptions of a partner's motives for health behaviour regulation.
    Berzins TL; LaBuda JE; Gere J
    Br J Health Psychol; 2018 Nov; 23(4):872-887. PubMed ID: 29882307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments.
    Little AC; Caldwell CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1119-27. PubMed ID: 21901646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are attractive facial characteristics peculiar to the sex of a face?
    Casey SJ; Mernagh M; Newell FN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):833-43. PubMed ID: 19132630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans.
    Roberts SC; Little AC; Gosling LM; Jones BC; Perrett DI; Carter V; Petrie M
    Biol Lett; 2005 Dec; 1(4):400-3. PubMed ID: 17148217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new data-driven mathematical model dissociates attractiveness from sexual dimorphism of human faces.
    Nakamura K; Watanabe K
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16588. PubMed ID: 33024137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.