These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23875192)

  • 1. What should the Cochrane Collaboration do about research that is, or might be, fraudulent?
    Carlisle J; Pace N; Cracknell J; Møller A; Pedersen T; Zacharias M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 May; 2013(5):ED000060. PubMed ID: 23875192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fraud. The journal's role concerning fraudulent research.
    Sharp DW
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jun; 26(6):586-9. PubMed ID: 1860767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis and implications of retraction period and coauthorship of fraudulent publications.
    Foo JY; Tan XJ
    Account Res; 2014; 21(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 24325213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers.
    Trikalinos NA; Evangelou E; Ioannidis JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):464-70. PubMed ID: 18394539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mistakes and misconduct in the research literature: retractions just the tip of the iceberg.
    Poulton A
    Med J Aust; 2007 Mar; 186(6):323-4. PubMed ID: 17371220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retraction challenges.
    Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7520):5. PubMed ID: 25279879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Authors slow to retract 'fraudulent' papers.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 1998 Jun; 393(6684):402. PubMed ID: 9623989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?
    Nath SB; Marcus SC; Druss BG
    Med J Aust; 2006 Aug; 185(3):152-4. PubMed ID: 16893357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Many journals have not retracted "fraudulent" research.
    Cooper-Mahkorn D
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7148):1850. PubMed ID: 11645074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Set up a 'self-retraction' system for honest errors.
    Fanelli D
    Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7595):415. PubMed ID: 27008933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. More consideration is needed for retracted non-Cochrane systematic reviews in medicine: a systematic review.
    Shi Q; Wang Z; Zhou Q; Hou R; Gao X; He S; Zhao S; Ma Y; Zhang X; Guan Q; Chen Y;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 139():57-67. PubMed ID: 34186193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-plagiarism case prompts calls for agencies to tighten rules.
    Reich ES
    Nature; 2010 Dec; 468(7325):745. PubMed ID: 21150967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
    Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors.
    Campos-Varela I; Ruano-Raviña A
    Gac Sanit; 2019; 33(4):356-360. PubMed ID: 29776690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inaction over retractions of identified fraudulent publications: ongoing weakness in the system of scientific self-correction.
    Wiedermann CJ
    Account Res; 2018; 25(4):239-253. PubMed ID: 29514510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retracted publications in the drug literature.
    Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS
    Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reflections on a retraction.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2000 Aug; 289(5482):1137. PubMed ID: 10970223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Letter to the editor: retraction and coauthorship in problematic publication.
    Wiwanitkit S; Wiwanitkit V
    Account Res; 2015; 22(2):120-1. PubMed ID: 25397602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.