These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23876092)
21. Fact or friction: Examination of the transparency, reliability and sufficiency of the ACE-V method of fingerprint analysis. Stevenage SV; Pitfield C Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Oct; 267():145-156. PubMed ID: 27611955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Statistical feature training improves fingerprint-matching accuracy in novices and professional fingerprint examiners. Growns B; Towler A; Dunn JD; Salerno JM; Schweitzer NJ; Dror IE Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Jul; 7(1):60. PubMed ID: 35841470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The low prevalence effect in fingerprint comparison amongst forensic science trainees and novices. Growns B; Dunn JD; Helm RK; Towler A; Kukucka J PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272338. PubMed ID: 35951612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Discrepancies in expert decision-making in forensic fingerprint examination. Mustonen V; Hakkarainen K; Tuunainen J; Pohjola P Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Sep; 254():215-26. PubMed ID: 26254629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A study of sex differences in fingerprint ridge density in a North Indian young adult population. Krishan K; Kanchan T; Ngangom C J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 May; 20(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 23622462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of expertise, target usefulness and image structure on visual search. Robson SG; Tangen JM; Searston RA Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Mar; 6(1):16. PubMed ID: 33709197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Training perceptual experts: Feedback, labels, and contrasts. Searston RA; Tangen JM Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 71(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 28252995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Holistic processing of fingerprints by expert forensic examiners. Vogelsang MD; Palmeri TJ; Busey TA Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2017; 2(1):15. PubMed ID: 28275708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. On the preliminary psychophysics of fingerprint identification. Vokey JR; Tangen JM; Cole SA Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):1023-40. PubMed ID: 19034812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Identification of recently handled materials by analysis of latent human fingerprints using infrared spectromicroscopy. Grant A; Wilkinson TJ; Holman DR; Martin MC Appl Spectrosc; 2005 Sep; 59(9):1182-7. PubMed ID: 16197643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Latent Fingerprint Matching: Performance Gain via Feedback from Exemplar Prints. Arora SS; Liu E; Cao K; Jain AK IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2014 Dec; 36(12):2452-65. PubMed ID: 26353151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis. Pena MM; Stoiloff S; Sparacino M; Schreiber Compo N J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38922874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners. Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32800. PubMed ID: 22427888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Operational benefits and challenges of the use of fingerprint statistical models: a field study. Neumann C; Mateos-Garcia I; Langenburg G; Kostroski J; Skerrett JE; Koolen M Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Oct; 212(1-3):32-46. PubMed ID: 21640531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]