These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23876584)
61. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach. Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Radical prostatectomy innovation and outcomes at military and civilian institutions. Leow JJ; Weissman JS; Kimsey L; Hoburg A; Helmchen LA; Jiang W; Hevelone N; Lipsitz SR; Nguyen LL; Chang SL Am J Manag Care; 2017 Jun; 23(6):342-347. PubMed ID: 28817298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. D'Alonzo RC; Gan TJ; Moul JW; Albala DM; Polascik TJ; Robertson CN; Sun L; Dahm P; Habib AS J Clin Anesth; 2009 Aug; 21(5):322-8. PubMed ID: 19700296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Blood transfusions in radical prostatectomy: a contemporary population-based analysis. Schmitges J; Sun M; Abdollah F; Trinh QD; Jeldres C; Budäus L; Bianchi M; Hansen J; Schlomm T; Perrotte P; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI Urology; 2012 Feb; 79(2):332-8. PubMed ID: 22310749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. The Effect of Obesity on Perioperative Outcomes for Open and Minimally Invasive Prostatectomy. Johnson SC; Packiam VT; Golan S; Cohen AJ; Nottingham CU; Smith ND Urology; 2017 Feb; 100():111-116. PubMed ID: 27890683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. The impact of operative approach in elective splenectomy: a multivariate analysis of outcomes from the NSQIP database. Deeb AP; Kim MJ; Fleming FJ; Messing S; Gunzler D; Monson JR; Salloum RM Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Oct; 22(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 23047384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients. Mikhail AA; Stockton BR; Orvieto MA; Chien GW; Gong EM; Zorn KC; Brendler CB; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL Urology; 2006 Apr; 67(4):774-9. PubMed ID: 16566979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Prostatectomy for benign prostate disease: open, laparoscopic and robotic techniques. Ferretti M; Phillips J Can J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22 Suppl 1():60-6. PubMed ID: 26497345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: the differential effect of regionalization, procedure volume and operative approach. Sammon JD; Karakiewicz PI; Sun M; Sukumar S; Ravi P; Ghani KR; Bianchi M; Peabody JO; Shariat SF; Perrotte P; Hu JC; Menon M; Trinh QD J Urol; 2013 Apr; 189(4):1289-94. PubMed ID: 23085052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Identification of specific quality improvement opportunities for the elderly undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Bentrem DJ; Cohen ME; Hynes DM; Ko CY; Bilimoria KY Arch Surg; 2009 Nov; 144(11):1013-20. PubMed ID: 19917937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Trainee participation and perioperative complications in benign hysterectomy: the effect of route of surgery. Barber EL; Harris B; Gehrig PA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):215.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26884272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Shorter duration of femoral-popliteal bypass is associated with decreased surgical site infection and shorter hospital length of stay. Tan TW; Kalish JA; Hamburg NM; Rybin D; Doros G; Eberhardt RT; Farber A J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Oct; 215(4):512-8. PubMed ID: 22819641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. Yu HY; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Kowalczyk KJ; Hu JC J Urol; 2012 Apr; 187(4):1392-8. PubMed ID: 22341274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. National trends and differences in morbidity among surgical approaches for radical prostatectomy in Germany. Stolzenburg JU; Kyriazis I; Fahlenbrach C; Gilfrich C; Günster C; Jeschke E; Popken G; Weißbach L; von Zastrow C; Leicht H World J Urol; 2016 Nov; 34(11):1515-1520. PubMed ID: 27012711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Rassweiler J; Seemann O; Schulze M; Teber D; Hatzinger M; Frede T J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1689-93. PubMed ID: 12686809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. A comparison of the peri-operative data after open radical retropubic prostatectomy or robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Uvin P; de Meyer JM; Van Holderbeke G Acta Chir Belg; 2010; 110(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 20690513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Comparison of transfusion requirements between open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Kordan Y; Barocas DA; Altamar HO; Clark PE; Chang SS; Davis R; Herrell SD; Baumgartner R; Mishra V; Chan RC; Smith JA; Cookson MS BJU Int; 2010 Oct; 106(7):1036-40. PubMed ID: 20151960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Risk of venous thromboembolism in abdominal versus minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign conditions. Barber EL; Neubauer NL; Gossett DR Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):609.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25511239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Colectomy performance improvement within NSQIP 2005-2008. Ozhathil DK; Li Y; Smith JK; Witkowski E; Coyne ER; Alavi K; Tseng JF; Shah SA J Surg Res; 2011 Nov; 171(1):e9-13. PubMed ID: 21872886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]