These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23876712)
1. Predicting bone remodeling around tissue- and bone-level dental implants used in reduced bone width. Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Dard MM; Cehreli MC J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(13):2250-7. PubMed ID: 23876712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting time-dependent remodeling of bone around immediately loaded dental implants with different designs. Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19884034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants. Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Numerical assessment of bone remodeling around conventionally and early loaded titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants. Akça K; Eser A; Çavuşoğlu Y; Sağırkaya E; Çehreli MC Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 May; 53(5):453-62. PubMed ID: 25725630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants. Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of tapered and external hexagon connections on bone stresses around tilted dental implants: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical analysis. de Faria Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Santiago JF; de Carvalho PS J Periodontol; 2014 Feb; 85(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 23688104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical property assessment of bone healing around a titanium-zirconium alloy dental implant. Anchieta RB; Baldassarri M; Guastaldi F; Tovar N; Janal MN; Gottlow J; Dard M; Jimbo R; Coelho PG Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):913-9. PubMed ID: 23527994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interaction of bone-dental implant with new ultra low modulus alloy using a numerical approach. Piotrowski B; Baptista AA; Patoor E; Bravetti P; Eberhardt A; Laheurte P Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 May; 38():151-60. PubMed ID: 24656363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures. Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Osman RB; Elkhadem AH; Ma S; Swain MV Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):e198-208. PubMed ID: 24066336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants. Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis. Pierrisnard L; Hure G; Barquins M; Chappard D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 12074450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element analysis. Tretto PHW; Dos Santos MBF; Spazzin AO; Pereira GKR; Bacchi A Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Jun; 23(8):372-383. PubMed ID: 32116034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution in Zirconia and Titanium Dental Implants. Lopez CAV; Vasco MAA; Ruales E; Bedoya KA; Benfatti CM; Bezzon OL; Deliberador TM J Oral Implantol; 2018 Dec; 44(6):409-415. PubMed ID: 29763360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting Peri-implant Stresses Around Titanium and Zirconium Dental Implants-A Finite Element Analysis. Gujjarlapudi MC; Nunna NV; Manne SD; Sarikonda VR; Madineni PK; Meruva RN J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2013 Sep; 13(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 24431734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stress and strain analysis of the bone-implant interface: a comparison of fiber-reinforced composite and titanium implants utilizing 3-dimensional finite element study. Shinya A; Ballo AM; Lassila LV; Shinya A; Närhi TO; Vallittu PK J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():133-40. PubMed ID: 20545537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis. Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]