These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23876959)

  • 1. Evaluation of the friction force generated by monocristalyne and policristalyne ceramic brackets in sliding mechanics.
    Pimentel RF; de Oliveira RS; Chaves Md; Elias CN; Gravina MA
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 23876959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro investigation on friction generated by ceramic brackets.
    Tecco S; Teté S; Festa M; Festa F
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e133-44. PubMed ID: 21490982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.
    Rajakulendran J; Jones S
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17203579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of frictional forces between ceramic brackets and archwires of different alloys compared with metal brackets.
    Guerrero AP; Guariza Filho O; Tanaka O; Camargo ES; Vieira S
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 20339712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
    Husain N; Kumar A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of artificial saliva on the frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires.
    Downing A; McCabe JF; Gordon PH
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 7786865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Friction behavior of ceramic injection-molded (CIM) brackets.
    Reimann S; Bourauel C; Weber A; Dirk C; Lietz T
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 27142040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of frictional forces of a new polycrystalline ceramic bracket versus metal-insert ceramic bracket before and after aging.
    Dergham CA; Khoury E; Ghoubril J
    Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):202-207. PubMed ID: 30981676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The dynamic frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.
    Tselepis M; Brockhurst P; West VC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 8059748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of stainless steel inserts on the resistance to sliding of esthetic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
    Thorstenson G; Kusy R
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Apr; 73(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 12725373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of Super Slick elastomeric modules in reducing friction during sliding: a comparative in vitro study.
    Pattan SK; Peddu R; Bandaru SK; Lanka D; Mallavarapu K; Pathan AB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Sep; 15(5):543-51. PubMed ID: 25707823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Zirconia brackets: an evaluation of morphology and coefficients of friction.
    Keith O; Kusy RP; Whitley JQ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Dec; 106(6):605-14. PubMed ID: 7977206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Study of force loss due to friction comparing two ceramic brackets during sliding tooth movement.
    AlSubaie M; Talic N; Khawatmi S; Alobeid A; Bourauel C; El-Bialy T
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Sep; 77(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 27384715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.
    Fourie Z; Ozcan M; Sandham A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the dry and wet states.
    Kusy RP; Whitley JQ; Prewitt MJ
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 1763840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
    De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets.
    Pratten DH; Popli K; Germane N; Gunsolley JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Nov; 98(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 2239837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface topography and frictional characteristics of ceramic brackets.
    Saunders CR; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jul; 106(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 8017353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlating Frictional Forces Generated by Different Bracket Types during Sliding and Surface Topography Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Optical Profilometer.
    AlBadr AH; Talic NF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Jan; 25(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 38514430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.
    Nishio C; da Motta AF; Elias CN; Mucha JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 14718880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.