140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23876966)
21. The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state.
Michelberger DJ; Eadie RL; Faulkner MG; Glover KE; Prasad NG; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 11113802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material.
Turnbull NR; Birnie DJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):395-9. PubMed ID: 17346597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. 2014 JCO Study of Orthodontic Diagnosis and Treatment Procedures, part 3: breakdowns by prescription appliance use.
Keim RG; Gottlieb EL; Vogels DS; Vogels PB
J Clin Orthod; 2014 Dec; 48(12):761-74. PubMed ID: 25708111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.
Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations.
Loftus BP; Artun J; Nicholls JI; Alonzo TA; Stoner JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 10474108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 25264808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.
Alobeid A; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Keilig L; Cornelius D; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Nov; 40(6):660-665. PubMed ID: 29546390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Friction behavior of ceramic injection-molded (CIM) brackets.
Reimann S; Bourauel C; Weber A; Dirk C; Lietz T
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 27142040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state.
Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep; 122(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 12226612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vitro biomechanical analysis of torque capabilities of various 0.018″ lingual bracket-wire systems: total torque play and slot size.
Daratsianos N; Bourauel C; Fimmers R; Jäger A; Schwestka-Polly R
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Oct; 38(5):459-69. PubMed ID: 26518759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An in vivo study on the incidence and location of fracture in round orthodontic archwires.
Guzman U; Jerrold L; Abdelkarim A
J Orthod; 2013 Dec; 40(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 24297962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Actual versus theoretical torsional play in conventional and self-ligating bracket systems.
Dalstra M; Eriksen H; Bergamini C; Melsen B
J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 42(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 25588827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Friction between various self-ligating brackets and archwire couples during sliding mechanics.
Stefanos S; Secchi AG; Coby G; Tanna N; Mante FK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):463-467. PubMed ID: 20889052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 14560270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures.
Thomas S; Sherriff M; Birnie D
Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 9825561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of friction between ceramic brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.
Angolkar PV; Kapila S; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Dec; 98(6):499-506. PubMed ID: 2248227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires.
Vaughan JL; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS; Currier GF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 7817958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.
Read-Ward GE; Jones SP; Davies EH
Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9459030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of galvanic corrosion potential of metal injection molded brackets to that of conventional metal brackets with nickel-titanium and copper nickel-titanium archwire combinations.
Varma DP; Chidambaram S; Reddy KB; Vijay M; Ravindranath D; Prasad MR
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):488-95. PubMed ID: 24171995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
