These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23876966)

  • 41. The Two by Four appliance: a nationwide cross-sectional survey.
    Quinzi V; Ferro R; Rizzo FA; Marranzini EM; Federici Canova F; Mummolo S; Mattei A; Marzo G
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2018 Jun; 19(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 29790779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sliding resistance of rectangular vs. beveled archwires in two self-ligating brackets: a finite element study.
    Iriarte AJ; Ortiz S; Cubides-Flechas K; Olaya C; Jaimes-Monroy G
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2018 Dec; 31(3):149-155. PubMed ID: 30829370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Variation in bracket slot sizes, ligation methods and prescriptions: UK national survey.
    Yassir YA; McIntyre GT; Bearn DR
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):519-528. PubMed ID: 31272839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets.
    Pratten DH; Popli K; Germane N; Gunsolley JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Nov; 98(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 2239837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A quantitative AFM analysis of nano-scale surface roughness in various orthodontic brackets.
    Lee GJ; Park KH; Park YG; Park HK
    Micron; 2010 Oct; 41(7):775-82. PubMed ID: 20646928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Does the design of self-ligating brackets show different behavior in terms of friction?
    Tecco S; Marzo G; Di Bisceglie B; Crincoli V; Tetè S; Festa F
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 22299106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Ultrastructural effect of self-ligating bracket materials on stainless steel and superelastic NiTi wire surfaces.
    Choi S; Lee S; Cheong Y; Park KH; Park HK; Park YG
    Microsc Res Tech; 2012 Aug; 75(8):1076-83. PubMed ID: 22419658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Numeric modeling of torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Huang Y; Keilig L; Rahimi A; Reimann S; Eliades T; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):638-43. PubMed ID: 19892278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.
    Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. In vitro evaluation of the influence of velocity on sliding resistance of stainless steel arch wires in a self-ligating orthodontic bracket.
    Savoldi F; Visconti L; Dalessandri D; Bonetti S; Tsoi JKH; Matinlinna JP; Paganelli C
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 May; 20(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 28414874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Measurement of friction forces between stainless steel wires and "reduced-friction" self-ligating brackets.
    Reznikov N; Har-Zion G; Barkana I; Abed Y; Redlich M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 20816303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Ion Release and Galvanic Corrosion of Different Orthodontic Brackets and Wires in Artificial Saliva.
    Tahmasbi S; Sheikh T; Hemmati YB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Mar; 18(3):222-227. PubMed ID: 28258269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.
    Bednar JR; Gruendeman GW; Sandrik JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Dec; 100(6):513-22. PubMed ID: 1962604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Songra G; Clover M; Atack NE; Ewings P; Sherriff M; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Brackets and friction in orthodontics: experimental study].
    Ben Rejeb Jdir S; Tobji S; Turki W; Dallel I; Khedher N; Ben Amor A
    Orthod Fr; 2015 Sep; 86(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 26370596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Future practice plans of orthodontic residents in the United States.
    Noble J; Hechter FJ; Karaiskos NE; Lekic N; Wiltshire WA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):357-60. PubMed ID: 19268835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets.
    Papageorgiou SN; Sifakakis I; Doulis I; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Prog Orthod; 2016; 17():5. PubMed ID: 26780465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparative experimental investigation of torque capabilities induced by conventional and active, passive self-ligating brackets.
    Katsikogianni EN; Reimann S; Weber A; Karp J; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug; 37(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 25414477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Urgencies and emergencies in orthodontics during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: Brazilian orthodontists' experience.
    Cotrin P; Peloso RM; Pini NIP; Oliveira RC; de Oliveira RCG; Valarelli FP; Freitas KMS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Nov; 158(5):661-667. PubMed ID: 32828609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An evaluation of clinicians' choices when selecting archwires.
    McNamara C; Drage KJ; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 19684124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.