These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23876984)

  • 1. FMS™ scores and low-back loading during lifting--whole-body movement screening as an ergonomic tool?
    Beach TA; Frost DM; Callaghan JP
    Appl Ergon; 2014 May; 45(3):482-9. PubMed ID: 23876984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An appraisal of the Functional Movement Screen™ grading criteria--Is the composite score sensitive to risky movement behavior?
    Frost DM; Beach TA; Campbell TL; Callaghan JP; McGill SM
    Phys Ther Sport; 2015 Nov; 16(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 26106038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unilateral ankle immobilization alters the kinematics and kinetics of lifting.
    Beach TA; Frost DM; Clark JM; Maly MR; Callaghan JP
    Work; 2014; 47(2):221-34. PubMed ID: 23324721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of lumbar spinal loading and trunk muscle forces during asymmetric lifting tasks: application of whole-body musculoskeletal modelling in OpenSim.
    Kim HK; Zhang Y
    Ergonomics; 2017 Apr; 60(4):563-576. PubMed ID: 27194401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of foot movement and an elastic lumbar back support on spinal loading during free-dynamic symmetric and asymmetric lifting exertions.
    Marras WS; Jorgensen MJ; Davis KG
    Ergonomics; 2000 May; 43(5):653-68. PubMed ID: 10877482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relation between spinal load factors and the high-risk probability of occupational low-back disorder.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1187-99. PubMed ID: 10503053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in spine loading patterns throughout the workday as a function of experience, lift frequency, and personality.
    Chany AM; Parakkat J; Yang G; Burr DL; Marras WS
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 16651224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of mental processing on low back load while lifting an object.
    Katsuhira J; Matsudaira K; Iwakiri K; Kimura Y; Ohashi T; Ono R; Sugita S; Fukuda K; Abe S; Maruyama H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E832-9. PubMed ID: 23722573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative analysis of low-back loading on chiropractors using various workstation table heights and performing various tasks.
    Lorme KJ; Naqvi SA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Jan; 26(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 12532135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of a lifting belt on spine moments and muscle recruitments after unexpected sudden loading.
    Lavender SA; Shakeel K; Andersson GB; Thomas JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jun; 25(12):1569-78. PubMed ID: 10851108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low back load in airport baggage handlers.
    Koblauch H
    Dan Med J; 2016 Apr; 63(4):. PubMed ID: 27034189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of snow shovel shaft configuration on lumbosacral biomechanics during a load-lifting task.
    Lewinson RT; Rouhi G; Robertson DG
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Mar; 45(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 23845725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Loading along the lumbar spine as influence by speed, control, load magnitude, and handle height during pushing.
    Marras WS; Knapik GG; Ferguson S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 19111950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical fitness improvements and occupational low-back loading - an exercise intervention study with firefighters.
    Beach TA; Frost DM; McGill SM; Callaghan JP
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(5):744-63. PubMed ID: 24689834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders.
    Marras WS; Lavender SA; Leurgans SE; Fathallah FA; Ferguson SA; Allread WG; Rajulu SL
    Ergonomics; 1995 Feb; 38(2):377-410. PubMed ID: 7895740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of unexpected lateral mass placement on trunk loading in lifting.
    van der Burg JC; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):764-70. PubMed ID: 12698118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of lifting height and load mass on low back loading.
    Hoozemans MJ; Kingma I; de Vries WH; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2008 Jul; 51(7):1053-63. PubMed ID: 18568964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using sitting as a component of job rotation strategies: are lifting/lowering kinetics and kinematics altered following prolonged sitting.
    Howarth SJ; Beach TA; Pearson AJ; Callaghan JP
    Appl Ergon; 2009 May; 40(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 19081557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One versus two-handed lifting and lowering: lumbar spine loads and recommended one-handed limits protecting the lower back.
    Weston EB; Aurand AM; Dufour JS; Knapik GG; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2020 Apr; 63(4):505-521. PubMed ID: 32024437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prevalence of low back disorders among female workers and biomechanical limits on the handling of load and patients.
    Gutiérrez M; Monzó J
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():2364-9. PubMed ID: 22317069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.