732 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23877267)
21. [A feasibility research of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) using hybrid internal fixation for recurrent lumbar disc herniation].
Mao KY; Wang Y; Xiao SH; Zhang YG; Liu BW; Wang Z; Zhang XF; Cui G; Zhang XS; Li P; Mao KZ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 51(8):723-7. PubMed ID: 24252680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study.
Seng C; Siddiqui MA; Wong KP; Zhang K; Yeo W; Tan SB; Yue WM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):2049-55. PubMed ID: 23963015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar instability by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].
Liang B; Yin G; Zhao J; Li N; Hu Z
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 25(12):1449-54. PubMed ID: 22242343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical and radiographic outcomes using local bone shavings as autograft in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Kasliwal MK; Deutsch H
World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):185-90. PubMed ID: 22120378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery.
Brodano GB; Martikos K; Lolli F; Gasbarrini A; Cioni A; Bandiera S; Silvestre MD; Boriani S; Greggi T
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Dec; 28(10):E559-64. PubMed ID: 24136060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Shen X; Zhang H; Gu X; Gu G; Zhou X; He S
J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1612-6. PubMed ID: 24814852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Research progress in comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].
Su K; Guo Y; Zhang Z; Jin D
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 27(11):1386-9. PubMed ID: 24501902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF) for the treatment of localised segment degeneration of lumbar spine].
Kunze B; Drasseck T; Kluba T
Z Orthop Unfall; 2011 Jun; 149(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 21341184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Video-assisted ALIF with cage and anterior plate fixation for L5-S1 spondylolisthesis.
Aunoble S; Hoste D; Donkersloot P; Liquois F; Basso Y; Le Huec JC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Oct; 19(7):471-6. PubMed ID: 17021409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Peng CW; Yue WM; Poh SY; Yeo W; Tan SB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jun; 34(13):1385-9. PubMed ID: 19478658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
Lee WC; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
World Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 85():236-43. PubMed ID: 26386459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up.
Kuo CH; Chang PY; Wu JC; Chang HK; Fay LY; Tu TH; Cheng H; Huang WC
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E3. PubMed ID: 26721577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of a radiographic solid fusion on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Park Y; Ha JW; Lee YT; Sung NY
Spine J; 2011 Mar; 11(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 21377602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Less invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion and obesity: clinical outcomes and return to work.
Singh AK; Ramappa M; Bhatia CK; Krishna M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Nov; 35(24):2116-20. PubMed ID: 20714279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Minimally invasive interbody fusion for revision lumbar surgery: technical feasibility and safety.
Selznick LA; Shamji MF; Isaacs RE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 May; 22(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 19412024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Full Percutaneous Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note.
Nakamura S; Taguchi M
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2017 Nov; 78(6):601-606. PubMed ID: 28800666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Lee SH; Choi WG; Lim SR; Kang HY; Shin SW
Spine J; 2004; 4(6):644-9. PubMed ID: 15541696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients.
Wang MY; Lerner J; Lesko J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 21685806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
