BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23877854)

  • 1. Early postoperative hemodynamic performances of stented versus stentless aortic xenografts in aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: a comparative study.
    Burgazli KM; Mericliler M; Erenturk S; Polat ZP; Atmaca N
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2013 Jul; 17(14):1894-900. PubMed ID: 23877854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
    Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stentless bioprostheses improve postoperative coronary flow more than stented prostheses after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Bakhtiary F; Schiemann M; Dzemali O; Wittlinger T; Doss M; Ackermann H; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 131(4):883-8. PubMed ID: 16580448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Full-root aortic valve replacement with stentless xenograft achieves superior regression of left ventricular hypertrophy compared to pericardial stented aortic valves.
    Tavakoli R; Auf der Maur C; Mueller X; Schläpfer R; Jamshidi P; Daubeuf F; Frossard N
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Feb; 10():15. PubMed ID: 25643748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The subcoronary Toronto stentless versus supra-annular Perimount stented replacement aortic valve: early clinical and hemodynamic results of a randomized comparison in 160 patients.
    Chambers JB; Rimington HM; Hodson F; Rajani R; Blauth CI
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 131(4):878-2. PubMed ID: 16580447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stentless aortic valves are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid-term follow-up: a large retrospective study.
    Borger MA; Carson SM; Ivanov J; Rao V; Scully HE; Feindel CM; David TE
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Dec; 80(6):2180-5. PubMed ID: 16305867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early postoperative outcome and hemodynamic performance of the sorin pericarbon stentless aortic valve.
    Bonacchi M; Giunti G; Prifti E; Rostagno C; Bini M; Frati G; Sani G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):703-9. PubMed ID: 12358408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of high transvalvular to subvalvular velocity ratio early after aortic valve replacement with Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
    Bach DS; Cartier PA; Kon N; Johnson KG; Dumesnil JG; Doty DB;
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):75-81. PubMed ID: 11805953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Haemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression: a comparison of the stentless, stented and mechanical aortic valve replacement.
    Thomson HL; O'Brien MF; Almeida AA; Tesar PJ; Davison MB; Burstow DJ
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 May; 13(5):572-5. PubMed ID: 9663541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stentless and stented aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: Factors affecting midterm clinical and hemodynamical outcome.
    Bové T; Van Belleghem Y; François K; Caes F; Van Overbeke H; Van Nooten G
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Nov; 30(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 16950630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: hemodynamic comparison of stented and stentless aortic valves.
    Yun KL; Jamieson WR; Khonsari S; Burr LH; Munro AI; Sintek CF
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Oct; 11(4 Suppl 1):98-102. PubMed ID: 10660175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemodynamic performance on exercise: comparison of a stentless and stented biological aortic valve replacement.
    Chambers J; Rimington H; Rajani R; Hodson F; Blauth C
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Sep; 13(5):729-33. PubMed ID: 15473470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective randomized evaluation of stentless vs. stented aortic biologic prosthetic valves in the elderly at five years.
    Risteski PS; Martens S; Rouhollahpour A; Wimmer-Greinecker G; Moritz A; Doss M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Apr; 8(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 19126556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early hemodynamic evaluation of Trifecta and Freestyle bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic root: preliminary results from a prospective randomized study.
    Tasca G; Stefano A; Giannico F; Lobiati E; Riva B; Galanti A; Triggiani M; Gamba A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Sep; 23(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 25799714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve with the Toronto Stentless Porcine Valve.
    Cohen G; Zagorski B; Christakis GT; Joyner CD; Vincent J; Sever J; Harbi S; Feder-Elituv R; Moussa F; Goldman BS; Fremes SE
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Apr; 139(4):848-59. PubMed ID: 20080264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Stentless bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement].
    Fukui S; Matsumiya G; Matsue H; Sawa Y
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Mar; 108(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17405541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stentless bioprostheses for the small aortic root.
    Walther T; Falk V; Diegeler A; Autschbach R; Gummert J; Baryalei M; Mohr FW
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov; 5 Suppl 3():S302-7. PubMed ID: 8953458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemodynamic performance after stented vs stentless aortic valve replacement.
    Jasinski MJ; Hayton J; Kadziola Z; Wos S; Sosnowski AW
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2002 Jun; 43(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 12055562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stentless aortic valve replacement with the biocor prosthesis: indications and outcome.
    Achtelik M; Pethig K; Schäfers HJ; Borst HG
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov; 5 Suppl 3():S314-6. PubMed ID: 8953460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of small valve size on hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression with the Toronto SPV stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
    Bach DS; Goldman B; Verrier E; Petracek M; Wood J; Goldman S; David T;
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Mar; 11(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 12000166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.