These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2387907)
1. Factors contributing to skeletal relapse after surgical correlation of mandibular prognathism. Michiwaki Y; Yoshida H; Ohno K; Michi K J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1990 Jul; 18(5):195-200. PubMed ID: 2387907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism. Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postoperative changes in mandibular prognathism surgically treated by intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Nihara J; Takeyama M; Takayama Y; Mutoh Y; Saito I Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 22858240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term stability of mandibular setback surgery: a follow-up of 80 bilateral sagittal split osteotomy patients. Mobarak KA; Krogstad O; Espeland L; Lyberg T Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(2):83-95. PubMed ID: 11307427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relapse after SSRO for mandibular setback movement in relation to the amount of mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment. Han JJ; Yang HJ; Lee SJ; Hwang SJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 24411469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism. Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contributing factors to intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment as a relapse factor after mandibular setback with sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Yang HJ; Hwang SJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):e57-63. PubMed ID: 23830770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients. Chou JI; Fong HJ; Kuang SH; Gi LY; Hwang FY; Lai YC; Chang RC; Kao SY J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 15742287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stability of the mandible after sagittal ramus osteotomy for correction of prognathism. Kobayashi T; Watanabe I; Ueda K; Nakajima T J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1986 Sep; 44(9):693-7. PubMed ID: 3462361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Results in Good Long-Term Mandibular Stability in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism and Anterior Open Bite. Choi SH; Cha JY; Park HS; Hwang CJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 74(4):804-10. PubMed ID: 26518527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: long-term results. de Villa GH; Huang CS; Chen PK; Chen YR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1584-92. PubMed ID: 16243174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy and factors related to skeletal relapse. Chen CM; Lai SS; Wang CH; Wu JH; Lee KT; Lee HE Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Apr; 35(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 20871995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stability of Pre-Orthodontic Orthognathic Surgery Using Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Versus Conventional Treatment. Choi SH; Hwang CJ; Baik HS; Jung YS; Lee KJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 74(3):610-9. PubMed ID: 26259691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Postoperative evaluation in mandibular prognathism treated by bilateral sagittal split osteotomy]. Liou JW; Huang CS; Wang FL; Chen YR Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1995 Jun; 18(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 7641107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between the change of gonial region and skeletal relapse after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism. Lee KT; Lai SS; Wu JH; Lee HE; Chen CM J Craniofac Surg; 2011 May; 22(3):818-21. PubMed ID: 21558938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cause of early skeletal relapse after mandibular setback. Komori E; Aigase K; Sugisaki M; Tanabe H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Jan; 95(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 2910023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of intraoral verticosagittal ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: a 10-year study. Hashemi HM J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):509-12. PubMed ID: 18280385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Postoperative stability for surgery-first approach using intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: 12 month follow-up. Kim JY; Jung HD; Kim SY; Park HS; Jung YS Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 52(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 24746355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery. RodrĂguez RR; González M Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Jan; 81(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 8850479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies for mandibular setback: a longitudinal study. Kung AYH; Leung YY Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 47(2):152-159. PubMed ID: 28966068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]