822 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23879102)
21. Unilateral and bilateral sacropelvic fixation result in similar construct biomechanics.
Tomlinson T; Chen J; Upasani V; Mahar A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):2127-33. PubMed ID: 18794753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Transdiscal L5-S1 screws for the fixation of isthmic spondylolisthesis: a biomechanical evaluation.
Minamide A; Akamaru T; Yoon ST; Tamaki T; Rhee JM; Hutton WC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Apr; 16(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 12679668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical evaluation of translaminar facet joint fixation. A comparative study of poly-L-lactide pins, screws, and pedicle fixation.
Deguchi M; Cheng BC; Sato K; Matsuyama Y; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun; 23(12):1307-12; discussion 1313. PubMed ID: 9654619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment.
Mihara H; Onari K; Cheng BC; David SM; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adjustment of suboptimally placed lumbar pedicle screws decreases pullout strength and alters biomechanics of the construct: a pilot cadaveric study.
Wadhwa RK; Thakur JD; Khan IS; James J; Ahmed O; Zhang S; Henderson B; Ogden A; Guthikonda B; Nanda A
World Neurosurg; 2015 Mar; 83(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 24793978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Feasibility and biomechanical performance of a novel transdiscal screw system for one level in non-spondylolisthetic lumbar fusion: an in vitro investigation.
Aghayev K; Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Lee WE; Waddell JK; Vrionis FD
Spine J; 2014 Apr; 14(4):705-13. PubMed ID: 24268392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis.
Slucky AV; Brodke DS; Bachus KN; Droge JA; Braun JT
Spine J; 2006; 6(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16413452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Types of spinal instability that require interbody support in posterior lumbar reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical investigation.
Oda I; Abumi K; Yu BS; Sudo H; Minami A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1573-80. PubMed ID: 12865847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Minimum 2-year analysis of sacropelvic fixation and L5-S1 fusion using S1 and iliac screws.
Kuklo TR; Bridwell KH; Lewis SJ; Baldus C; Blanke K; Iffrig TM; Lenke LG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep; 26(18):1976-83. PubMed ID: 11547195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical effects of the extent of sacrectomy on the stability of lumbo-iliac reconstruction using iliac screw techniques: What level of sacrectomy requires the bilateral dual iliac screw technique?
Yu BS; Zhuang XM; Li ZM; Zheng ZM; Zhou ZY; Zou XN; Lu WW
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Nov; 25(9):867-72. PubMed ID: 20655639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Choice of bone cement augmentation techniques when sacral pedicle screw loosening].
Yu B; Zhuang X; Li Z; Zheng Z
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 24(2):211-4. PubMed ID: 20187455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical Comparison of Spinopelvic Fixation Constructs: Iliac Screw Versus S2-Alar-Iliac Screw.
Burns CB; Dua K; Trasolini NA; Komatsu DE; Barsi JM
Spine Deform; 2016 Jan; 4(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 27852493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effects of cyclic loading on pull-out strength of sacral screw fixation: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Zhu Q; Lu WW; Holmes AD; Zheng Y; Zhong S; Leong JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 May; 25(9):1065-9. PubMed ID: 10788849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of the effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation and interspinous fixation on the stiffness of adjacent segments.
Li CD; Sun HL; Lu HZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2013; 126(9):1732-7. PubMed ID: 23652059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical evaluation of supplemental percutaneous lumbo-sacro-iliac screws for spinopelvic fixation following total sacrectomy.
Le VH; Heckmann N; Jain N; Wang L; Turner AW; Lee TQ; Bederman SS
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 May; 28(4):E181-5. PubMed ID: 25905801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In vitro biomechanical analysis of a new lumbar low-profile locking screw-plate construct versus a standard top-loading cantilevered pedicle screw-rod construct: technical report.
Crawford NR; Doğan S; Yüksel KZ; Villasana-Ramos O; Soto-Barraza JC; Sawa AG; Porter RW; Marciano FF; Theodore N
Neurosurgery; 2010 Feb; 66(2):E404-6; discussion E406. PubMed ID: 20087110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A biomechanical comparison of different types of lumbopelvic fixation.
Tis JE; Helgeson M; Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(24):E866-72. PubMed ID: 19910754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A stronger bicortical sacral pedicle screw fixation through the s1 endplate: an in vitro cyclic loading and pull-out force evaluation.
Luk KD; Chen L; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Mar; 30(5):525-9. PubMed ID: 15738784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Influence of two kinds of bone grafting methods on bone defect gap residual rates and compressive stiffness after reduction of thoracolumbar burst fracture].
Ao J; Xin Z; Chen F; Xin X; Liao W
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 27(8):974-9. PubMed ID: 24171354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
