These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23879526)

  • 1. Information-theoretical assessment of the performance of likelihood ratio computation methods.
    Ramos D; Gonzalez-Rodriguez J; Zadora G; Aitken C
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1503-18. PubMed ID: 23879526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliable support: Measuring calibration of likelihood ratios.
    Ramos D; Gonzalez-Rodriguez J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):156-69. PubMed ID: 23664798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Information-theoretical feature selection using data obtained by scanning electron microscopy coupled with and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer for the classification of glass traces.
    Ramos D; Zadora G
    Anal Chim Acta; 2011 Oct; 705(1-2):207-17. PubMed ID: 21962363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wine authenticity verification as a forensic problem: an application of likelihood ratio test to label verification.
    Martyna A; Zadora G; Stanimirova I; Ramos D
    Food Chem; 2014 May; 150():287-95. PubMed ID: 24360452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated face recognition in forensic science: Review and perspectives.
    Jacquet M; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Feb; 307():110124. PubMed ID: 31927397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of lead isotopic ratios of glass objects with the aim of comparing them for forensic purposes.
    Martyna A; Sjastad KE; Zadora G; Ramos D
    Talanta; 2013 Feb; 105():158-66. PubMed ID: 23598003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementation and assessment of a likelihood ratio approach for the evaluation of LA-ICP-MS evidence in forensic glass analysis.
    van Es A; Wiarda W; Hordijk M; Alberink I; Vergeer P
    Sci Justice; 2017 May; 57(3):181-192. PubMed ID: 28454627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 'Low' LRs obtained from DNA mixtures: On calibration and discrimination performance of probabilistic genotyping software.
    McCarthy-Allen M; Bleka Ø; Ypma R; Gill P; Benschop C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Nov; 73():103099. PubMed ID: 39089059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring calibration of likelihood-ratio systems: A comparison of four metrics, including a new metric devPAV.
    Vergeer P; van Schaik Y; Sjerps M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Apr; 321():110722. PubMed ID: 33684845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deconstructing Cross-Entropy for Probabilistic Binary Classifiers.
    Ramos D; Franco-Pedroso J; Lozano-Diez A; Gonzalez-Rodriguez J
    Entropy (Basel); 2018 Mar; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 33265299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of any number of minutiae.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Puch-Solis R; Egli N; Anthonioz A; Bromage-Griffiths A
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jan; 52(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 17209910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of LA-ICP-MS databases to calculate likelihood ratios for the forensic analysis of glass evidence.
    Corzo R; Hoffman T; Weis P; Franco-Pedroso J; Ramos D; Almirall J
    Talanta; 2018 Aug; 186():655-661. PubMed ID: 29784417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian analysis of fingerprint, face and signature evidences with automatic biometric systems.
    Gonzalez-Rodriguez J; Fierrez-Aguilar J; Ramos-Castro D; Ortega-Garcia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Dec; 155(2-3):126-40. PubMed ID: 16226150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of three minutiae.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Puch-Solis R; Egli N; Anthonioz A; Meuwly D; Bromage-Griffiths A
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1255-66. PubMed ID: 17199611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two heads are better than one: Dual systems obtain better performance in facial comparison.
    Li Z; Xie L; Song H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Dec; 353():111879. PubMed ID: 37948948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Likelihood ratio model for classification of forensic evidence.
    Zadora G; Neocleous T
    Anal Chim Acta; 2009 May; 642(1-2):266-78. PubMed ID: 19427485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strength of linguistic text evidence: A fused forensic text comparison system.
    Ishihara S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():184-197. PubMed ID: 28735218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sampling variability in forensic likelihood-ratio computation: A simulation study.
    Ali T; Spreeuwers L; Veldhuis R; Meuwly D
    Sci Justice; 2015 Dec; 55(6):499-508. PubMed ID: 26654086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--modelling within finger variability.
    Egli NM; Champod C; Margot P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):189-95. PubMed ID: 16914278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.