These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23879526)
21. On compensation of mismatched recording conditions in the Bayesian approach for forensic automatic speaker recognition. Botti F; Alexander A; Drygajlo A Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Dec; 146 Suppl():S101-6. PubMed ID: 15639552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation. Meuwly D; Ramos D; Haraksim R Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jul; 276():142-153. PubMed ID: 27181589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Score-based likelihood ratios for linguistic text evidence with a bag-of-words model. Ishihara S Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Oct; 327():110980. PubMed ID: 34481115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of signature handwriting evidence via score-based likelihood ratio based on comparative measurement of relevant dynamic features. Chen XH; Champod C; Yang X; Shi SP; Luo YW; Wang N; Wang YC; Lu QM Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jan; 282():101-110. PubMed ID: 29182954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Measuring coherence of computer-assisted likelihood ratio methods. Haraksim R; Ramos D; Meuwly D; Berger CE Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Apr; 249():123-32. PubMed ID: 25698513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. New perspectives in the use of ink evidence in forensic science: Part I. Development of a quality assurance process for forensic ink analysis by HPTLC. Neumann C; Margot P Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Mar; 185(1-3):29-37. PubMed ID: 19147310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Using continuous DNA interpretation methods to revisit likelihood ratio behaviour. Taylor D Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jul; 11():144-53. PubMed ID: 24727432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In the context of forensic casework, are there meaningful metrics of the degree of calibration? Morrison GS Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2021; 3():100157. PubMed ID: 34179740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States. Paciorek CJ; Liu Y; Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantitative assessment of evidential weight for a fingerprint comparison. Part II: a generalisation to take account of the general pattern. Neumann C; Evett IW; Skerrett JE; Mateos-Garcia I Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):195-9. PubMed ID: 21885220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multi-element comparisons of tapes evidence using dimensionality reduction for calculating likelihood ratios. Gupta A; Martinez-Lopez C; Curran JM; Almirall JR Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Aug; 301():426-434. PubMed ID: 31229846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Handwriting evidence evaluation based on the shape of characters: application of multivariate likelihood ratios. Marquis R; Bozza S; Schmittbuhl M; Taroni F J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S238-42. PubMed ID: 21198625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Improved accuracy when screening for human growth disorders by likelihood ratios. van Buuren S Stat Med; 2008 Apr; 27(9):1527-38. PubMed ID: 17708513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Calibrating E-values for hidden Markov models using reverse-sequence null models. Karplus K; Karchin R; Shackelford G; Hughey R Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4107-15. PubMed ID: 16123115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Different likelihood ratio approaches to evaluate the strength of evidence of MDMA tablet comparisons. Bolck A; Weyermann C; Dujourdy L; Esseiva P; van den Berg J Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Oct; 191(1-3):42-51. PubMed ID: 19608360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Likelihood ratio data to report the validation of a forensic fingerprint evaluation method. Ramos D; Haraksim R; Meuwly D Data Brief; 2017 Feb; 10():75-92. PubMed ID: 27981197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems. Morrison GS Sci Justice; 2011 Sep; 51(3):91-8. PubMed ID: 21889105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A procedure for determining whether a simple combination of diagnostic tests may be noninferior to the theoretical optimum combination. Jin H; Lu Y Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 18556633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]