468 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23879577)
1. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of osseointegrated implants: a 5-year follow-up study on one or two-stage surgery, number of implants, implant surfaces, and age at surgery.
Friberg B; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):413-24. PubMed ID: 23879577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients.
Friberg B; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18254740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of four TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 75 patients.
Friberg B; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e56-62. PubMed ID: 20491817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of turned Brånemark System implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 152 patients.
Friberg B; Henningsson C; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15903168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simplified methods of implant treatment in the edentulous lower jaw: a 3-year follow-up report of a controlled prospective study of one-stage versus two-stage surgery and early loading.
Engquist B; Astrand P; Anzén B; Dahlgren S; Engquist E; Feldmann H; Karlsson U; Nord PG; Sahlholm S; Svärdström P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 15996356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome of Brånemark Novum implant treatment in edentulous mandibles: a retrospective 5-year follow-up study.
Gualini F; Gualini G; Cominelli R; Lekholm U
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 18783416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simplified methods of implant treatment in the edentulous lower jaw. Part II: Early loading.
Engquist B; Astrand P; Anzén B; Dahlgren S; Engquist E; Feldmann H; Karlsson U; Nord PG; Sahlholm S; Svärdström P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2004; 6(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 15669709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrospective analysis of early and delayed loading of full-arch mandibular prostheses using three different implant systems: clinical results with up to 5 years of loading.
Eliasson A; Blomqvist F; Wennerberg A; Johansson A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):134-48. PubMed ID: 18384397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant treatment of patients with edentulous jaws: a 20-year follow-up.
Astrand P; Ahlqvist J; Gunne J; Nilson H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):207-17. PubMed ID: 18384411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Turned Brånemark System implants in wide and narrow edentulous maxillae: a retrospective clinical study.
Friberg B; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 18462203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediate function on the day of surgery compared with a delayed implant loading process in the mandible: a randomized clinical trial over 5 years.
Jokstad A; Alkumru H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1325-35. PubMed ID: 24148020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A 5-year prospective multicenter study on 1-stage smooth-surface Brånemark System implants with early loading in edentulous mandibles.
Friberg B; Raghoebar GM; Grunert I; Hobkirk JA; Tepper G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):481-6. PubMed ID: 18700372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early loading of machined-surface Brånemark implants in completely edentulous mandibles: healed bone versus fresh extraction sites.
De Bruyn H; Collaert B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2002; 4(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 12516646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant treatment in the edentulous maxillae: a 15-year follow-up study on 76 consecutive patients provided with fixed prostheses.
Jemt T; Johansson J
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):61-9. PubMed ID: 16774591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A 5-year prospective clinical study of submerged and nonsubmerged Paragon system implants in the edentulous mandible.
Eliasson A; Narby B; Ekstrand K; Hirsch J; Johansson A; Wennerberg A
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 20552088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simplified methods of implant treatment in the edentulous lower jaw. A controlled prospective study. Part I: one-stage versus two-stage surgery.
Engquist B; Astrand P; Anzén B; Dahlgren S; Engquist E; Feldmann H; Karlsson U; Nord PG; Sahlholm S; Svärdström P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2002; 4(2):93-103. PubMed ID: 12121609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized controlled clinical trial of edentulous patients treated with immediately loaded implant-supported mandibular fixed prostheses.
Alfadda SA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):806-16. PubMed ID: 23506407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of implant design on preservation of marginal bone in the mandible.
Van de Velde T; Collaert B; Sennerby L; De Bruyn H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 19220843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective multicenter clinical trial comparing one- and two-stage titanium screw-shaped fixtures with one-stage plasma-sprayed solid-screw fixtures.
Becker W; Becker BE; Ricci A; Bahat O; Rosenberg E; Rose LF; Handelsman M; Israelson H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2000; 2(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 11359261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. One-year outcomes of Neoss bimodal implants. A prospective clinical, radiographic, and RFA study.
Sennerby L; Andersson P; Verrocchi D; Viinamäki R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 20345985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
