These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23879577)
1. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of osseointegrated implants: a 5-year follow-up study on one or two-stage surgery, number of implants, implant surfaces, and age at surgery. Friberg B; Jemt T Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):413-24. PubMed ID: 23879577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients. Friberg B; Jemt T Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18254740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of four TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 75 patients. Friberg B; Jemt T Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e56-62. PubMed ID: 20491817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of turned Brånemark System implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 152 patients. Friberg B; Henningsson C; Jemt T Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15903168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simplified methods of implant treatment in the edentulous lower jaw: a 3-year follow-up report of a controlled prospective study of one-stage versus two-stage surgery and early loading. Engquist B; Astrand P; Anzén B; Dahlgren S; Engquist E; Feldmann H; Karlsson U; Nord PG; Sahlholm S; Svärdström P Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 15996356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome of Brånemark Novum implant treatment in edentulous mandibles: a retrospective 5-year follow-up study. Gualini F; Gualini G; Cominelli R; Lekholm U Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 18783416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simplified methods of implant treatment in the edentulous lower jaw. Part II: Early loading. Engquist B; Astrand P; Anzén B; Dahlgren S; Engquist E; Feldmann H; Karlsson U; Nord PG; Sahlholm S; Svärdström P Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2004; 6(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 15669709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrospective analysis of early and delayed loading of full-arch mandibular prostheses using three different implant systems: clinical results with up to 5 years of loading. Eliasson A; Blomqvist F; Wennerberg A; Johansson A Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):134-48. PubMed ID: 18384397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant treatment of patients with edentulous jaws: a 20-year follow-up. Astrand P; Ahlqvist J; Gunne J; Nilson H Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):207-17. PubMed ID: 18384411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Turned Brånemark System implants in wide and narrow edentulous maxillae: a retrospective clinical study. Friberg B; Jemt T Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 18462203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediate function on the day of surgery compared with a delayed implant loading process in the mandible: a randomized clinical trial over 5 years. Jokstad A; Alkumru H Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1325-35. PubMed ID: 24148020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A 5-year prospective multicenter study on 1-stage smooth-surface Brånemark System implants with early loading in edentulous mandibles. Friberg B; Raghoebar GM; Grunert I; Hobkirk JA; Tepper G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):481-6. PubMed ID: 18700372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early loading of machined-surface Brånemark implants in completely edentulous mandibles: healed bone versus fresh extraction sites. De Bruyn H; Collaert B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2002; 4(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 12516646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant treatment in the edentulous maxillae: a 15-year follow-up study on 76 consecutive patients provided with fixed prostheses. Jemt T; Johansson J Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):61-9. PubMed ID: 16774591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A 5-year prospective clinical study of submerged and nonsubmerged Paragon system implants in the edentulous mandible. Eliasson A; Narby B; Ekstrand K; Hirsch J; Johansson A; Wennerberg A Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 20552088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simplified methods of implant treatment in the edentulous lower jaw. A controlled prospective study. Part I: one-stage versus two-stage surgery. Engquist B; Astrand P; Anzén B; Dahlgren S; Engquist E; Feldmann H; Karlsson U; Nord PG; Sahlholm S; Svärdström P Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2002; 4(2):93-103. PubMed ID: 12121609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized controlled clinical trial of edentulous patients treated with immediately loaded implant-supported mandibular fixed prostheses. Alfadda SA Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):806-16. PubMed ID: 23506407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of implant design on preservation of marginal bone in the mandible. Van de Velde T; Collaert B; Sennerby L; De Bruyn H Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 19220843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective multicenter clinical trial comparing one- and two-stage titanium screw-shaped fixtures with one-stage plasma-sprayed solid-screw fixtures. Becker W; Becker BE; Ricci A; Bahat O; Rosenberg E; Rose LF; Handelsman M; Israelson H Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2000; 2(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 11359261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. One-year outcomes of Neoss bimodal implants. A prospective clinical, radiographic, and RFA study. Sennerby L; Andersson P; Verrocchi D; Viinamäki R Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 20345985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]