These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit. Tan HL; Pinder M; Parsons R; Roberts B; van Heerden PV Br J Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 94(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 15653709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparisons of Continuous-wave Doppler Ultrasound Monitor and Echocardiography in Cardiac Postoperative Pediatric Patients. Shostak E; Nahum E; Shochat T; Manor O; Dagan O; Schiller O J Intensive Care Med; 2022 Dec; 37(12):1634-1640. PubMed ID: 35503529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The normal ranges of cardiovascular parameters measured using the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor. Cattermole GN; Leung PY; Ho GY; Lau PW; Chan CP; Chan SS; Smith BE; Graham CA; Rainer TH Physiol Rep; 2017 Mar; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 28320891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A meta-analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM). Chong SW; Peyton PJ Anaesthesia; 2012 Nov; 67(11):1266-71. PubMed ID: 22928650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Does using two Doppler cardiac output monitors in tandem provide a reliable trend line of changes for validation studies? Li H; Critchley LA; Zhang J J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 26315476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Does patient position influence Doppler signal quality from the USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor? Siu L; Tucker A; Manikappa SK; Monagle J Anesth Analg; 2008 Jun; 106(6):1798-802. PubMed ID: 18499612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Measurement of cardiac output with a non-invasive continuous wave Doppler device versus the pulmonary artery catheter: a comparative study. Chan JS; Segara D; Nair P Crit Care Resusc; 2006 Dec; 8(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 17227267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study. Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Emergency physicians can reliably assess emergency department patient cardiac output using the USCOM continuous wave Doppler cardiac output monitor. Dey I; Sprivulis P Emerg Med Australas; 2005 Jun; 17(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 15953218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of the clinical utility of an ultrasonic monitor of cardiac output (the USCOM) and agreement with thermodilution measurement. Boyle M; Steel L; Flynn GM; Murgo M; Nicholson L; O'Brien M; Bihari D Crit Care Resusc; 2009 Sep; 11(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 19737122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Noninvasive cardiac output measurement in heart failure subjects on circulatory support. Phillips R; Lichtenthal P; Sloniger J; Burstow D; West M; Copeland J Anesth Analg; 2009 Mar; 108(3):881-6. PubMed ID: 19224797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ultrasonic cardiac output monitor provides accurate measurement of cardiac output in recipients after liver transplantation. Su BC; Lin CC; Su CW; Hui YL; Tsai YF; Yang MW; Lui PW Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2008 Dec; 46(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 19097964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cardiac output measurement in newborn infants using the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: an assessment of agreement with conventional echocardiography, repeatability and new user experience. Patel N; Dodsworth M; Mills JF Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2011 May; 96(3):F206-11. PubMed ID: 20605971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Validation of an Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor as a Bedside Tool for Pediatric Patients. Beltramo F; Menteer J; Razavi A; Khemani RG; Szmuszkovicz J; Newth CJ; Ross PA Pediatr Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 37(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 26364291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Application of intraoperative arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Lu JK; Zhu C; Jing H; Wang YJ; Qing EM Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Jun; 125(12):2099-103. PubMed ID: 22884136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Non-invasive method for rapid bedside estimation of inotropy: theory and preliminary clinical validation. Smith BE; Madigan VM Br J Anaesth; 2013 Oct; 111(4):580-8. PubMed ID: 23645929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prediction of fluid responsiveness using a non-invasive cardiac output monitor in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Lee JH; No HJ; Song IK; Kim HS; Kim CS; Kim JT Br J Anaesth; 2015 Jul; 115(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 25926311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]