These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2388013)

  • 1. Comparison of balanced forces, endosonic, and step-back filing instrumentation techniques: quantification of extruded apical debris.
    McKendry DJ
    J Endod; 1990 Jan; 16(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 2388013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques.
    Myers GL; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1991 Jun; 17(6):275-9. PubMed ID: 1940753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of debris extruded apically in straight canals: conventional filing versus profile .04 Taper series 29.
    Beeson TJ; Hartwell GR; Thornton JD; Gunsolley JC
    J Endod; 1998 Jan; 24(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 9487860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques.
    Reddy SA; Hicks ML
    J Endod; 1998 Mar; 24(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 9558583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The efficacy of step-down procedures during endosonic instrumentation.
    Murgel C; Walmsley AD; Walton RE
    J Endod; 1991 Mar; 17(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 1940723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of apically extruded debris in conventional and rotary instrumentation techniques.
    Bidar M; Rastegar AF; Ghaziani P; Namazikhah MS
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Sep; 32(9):665-71. PubMed ID: 15553960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of different endodontic procedures on dentin morphology of human teeth.
    Prati C; Selighini M; Ferrieri P; Mongiorgi R
    J Endod; 1994 Apr; 20(4):174-9. PubMed ID: 8035157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques.
    Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Er K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 18230395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of Canal Master, Flex-R, and K-Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration.
    Leseberg DA; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 1919403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound after step-back preparation in mandibular molars.
    Archer R; Reader A; Nist R; Beck M; Meyers WJ
    J Endod; 1992 Nov; 18(11):549-52. PubMed ID: 1298792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of amounts of apically extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel-titanium instrument systems.
    Hinrichs RE; Walker WA; Schindler WG
    J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9641140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro study of apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite during endodontic canal preparation.
    Brown DC; Moore BK; Brown CE; Newton CW
    J Endod; 1995 Dec; 21(12):587-91. PubMed ID: 8596077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris using 3 different rotary instrumentation systems.
    Tanalp J; Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Bayirl G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Feb; 101(2):250-7. PubMed ID: 16448929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vivo comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars.
    Haidet J; Reader A; Beck M; Meyers W
    J Endod; 1989 May; 15(5):195-9. PubMed ID: 2607289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
    Er K; Sümer Z; Akpinar KE
    Int Endod J; 2005 Dec; 38(12):871-6. PubMed ID: 16343113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantity of apical extruded material and efficiency of five different methods of removing gutta-percha and sealer from root canals--"in vitro" evaluation.
    Aun CE; dos Santos M
    Rev Faculdade Odontol FZL; 1989; 1(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 2485645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of apical clearing: histological and radiographical evaluation.
    Parris J; Wilcox L; Walton R
    J Endod; 1994 May; 20(5):219-24. PubMed ID: 7931011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals.
    Siqueira JF; Araújo MC; Garcia PF; Fraga RC; Dantas CJ
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 9587319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Critical analysis of the balanced force technique in endodontics.
    Kyomen SM; Caputo AA; White SN
    J Endod; 1994 Jul; 20(7):332-7. PubMed ID: 7996094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic and sonic instrumentation of curved root canals.
    Walker TL; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1989 Feb; 15(2):49-59. PubMed ID: 2607269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.