These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Dentin permeability and restorative dentistry: a status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Pashley DH; Pashley EL Am J Dent; 1991 Feb; 4(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 2003896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth. Royse MC; Ott NW; Mathieu GP Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 8970205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pulpal inflammatory responses following non-carious class V restorations. About I; Murray PE; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 11504432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Characterizing the smear layer]. Cox CF Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1990 Mar; 97(3):107-8. PubMed ID: 2096306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reducing the risk of sensitivity and pulpal complications after the placement of crowns and fixed partial dentures. Brännström M Quintessence Int; 1996 Oct; 27(10):673-8. PubMed ID: 9180403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Biocompatibility of dentinal adhesive systems in conservative dentistry]. Fratamico FC; Prati C Dent Cadmos; 1990 Mar; 58(4):66-70. PubMed ID: 2203654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of bonded amalgam restorations on microleakage. Al-Jazairy YH; Louka AN Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 10823065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tooth sensitivity associated with the use of luting cements. Trowbridge HO Penn Dent J (Phila); 1995; 94(1-2):4-5, 24-6. PubMed ID: 15503428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage of seven adhesive systems in enamel and dentin. Silveira de Araújo C; Incerti da Silva T; Ogliari FA; Meireles SS; Piva E; Demarco FF J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):26-33. PubMed ID: 17091137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The smear layer in endodontics. Czonstkowsky M; Wilson EG; Holstein FA Dent Clin North Am; 1990 Jan; 34(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 2403940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Pashley DH; Ciucchi B; Sano H; Horner JA Quintessence Int; 1993 Sep; 24(9):618-31. PubMed ID: 8272500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation and treatment of bacterial microleakage. Cox CF Am J Dent; 1994 Oct; 7(5):293-5. PubMed ID: 7986455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Smear layer: overview of structure and function. Pashley DH Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1992; 88 Suppl 1():215-24. PubMed ID: 1508877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biocompatibility of dentine-bonding agents. 2. Pulpal considerations. Santini A Prim Dent Care; 1998 Apr; 5(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 9656939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement applied as pulp capping in human teeth. do Nascimento AB; Fontana UF; Teixeira HM; Costa CA Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11763899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pulpal response to adhesive resin systems applied to acid-etched vital dentin: damp versus dry primer application. White KC; Cox CF; Kanka J; Dixon DL; Farmer JB; Snuggs HM Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 8058899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of various conditioner agents on the interdiffusion zone and microleakage of a glass lonomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth. Yilmaz Y; Gurbuz T; Kocogullari ME Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 15765965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]