These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23880732)

  • 1. Validation of simulation of calcifications for observer studies in digital mammography.
    Warren LM; Green FH; Shrestha L; Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Young KC
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Aug; 58(16):N217-28. PubMed ID: 23880732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the x-ray attenuation properties of breast calcifications, aluminium, hydroxyapatite and calcium oxalate.
    Warren LM; Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Young KC
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(7):N103-13. PubMed ID: 23470559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative evaluation of dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging.
    Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(12):2563-76. PubMed ID: 15272674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calculation of the contrast of the calcification in digital mammography system: Gate validation.
    Arefan D; Talebpour A; Ahmadinejhad N; Asl AK
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(2):335-340. PubMed ID: 29516915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer detection rates using four different types of mammography detectors.
    Mackenzie A; Warren LM; Wallis MG; Cooke J; Given-Wilson RM; Dance DR; Chakraborty DP; Halling-Brown MD; Looney PT; Young KC
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Mar; 26(3):874-83. PubMed ID: 26105023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography.
    Warren LM; Mackenzie A; Cooke J; Given-Wilson RM; Wallis MG; Chakraborty DP; Dance DR; Bosmans H; Young KC
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3202-13. PubMed ID: 22755704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
    Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film).
    Rong XJ; Shaw CC; Johnston DA; Lemacks MR; Liu X; Whitman GJ; Dryden MJ; Stephens TW; Thompson SK; Krugh KT; Lai CJ
    Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2052-61. PubMed ID: 12349926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New CR system with pixel size of 50 microm for digital mammography: physical imaging properties and detection of subtle microcalcifications.
    Ideguchi T; Higashida Y; Kawaji Y; Sasaki M; Zaizen M; Shibayama R; Nakamura Y; Koyanagi K; Ikeda H; Ohki M; Toyofuku F; Muranaka T
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(4):218-24. PubMed ID: 15468941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD).
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Wenkel E; Bautz W
    Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance evaluation of contrast-detail in full field digital mammography systems using ideal (Hotelling) observer vs. conventional automated analysis of CDMAM images for quality control of contrast-detail characteristics.
    Delakis I; Wise R; Morris L; Kulama E
    Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):741-6. PubMed ID: 25735660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Digital storage phosphor mammography in a magnification technic: experimental studies for spatial resolution and for detection of microcalcifications].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Hundertmark C; Sachs J; Gruhl T; Sperner W; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1997 Aug; 167(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9333359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Algorithmic 3D simulation of breast calcifications for digital mammography.
    Näppi J; Dean PB; Nevalainen O; Toikkanen S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2001 Jul; 66(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 11378233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: noise reduction techniques.
    Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(19):5421-43. PubMed ID: 18765887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
    Honda C; Ohara H
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward image quality assessment in mammography using model observers: Detection of a calcification-like object.
    Bouwman RW; Mackenzie A; van Engen RE; Broeders MJM; Young KC; Dance DR; den Heeten GJ; Veldkamp WJH
    Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5726-5739. PubMed ID: 28837225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast calcification and mass detection with mammographic anode-filter combinations of molybdenum, tungsten, and rhodium.
    Kimme-Smith CM; Sayre JW; McCombs MM; DeBruhl ND; Bassett LW
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):679-83. PubMed ID: 9169688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography.
    Kimme-Smith C; Haus AG; DeBruhl N; Bassett LW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Mar; 168(3):775-8. PubMed ID: 9057533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Full-field digital mammography with amorphous silicon-based flat- panel detector: physical imaging characteristics and signal detection].
    Ideguchi T; Higashida Y; Himuro K; Ohki M; Nakamura S; Yoshida A; Takagi R; Hatano H; Kuwahara R; Toyonaga M; Tanaka I; Toyofuku F
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Mar; 60(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 15131510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.
    Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Marshall N; Meylaers T; Michielsen K; Marchal G; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.