These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23882005)

  • 21. A corpus of consonant-vowel-consonant real words and nonwords: comparison of phonotactic probability, neighborhood density, and consonant age of acquisition.
    Storkel HL
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Dec; 45(4):1159-67. PubMed ID: 23307574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of word characteristics on the vocabulary of children with cochlear implants.
    Han MK; Storkel HL; Lee J; Yoshinaga-Itano C
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2015 Jul; 20(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 25802320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The emerging lexicon of children with phonological delays: phonotactic constraints and probability in acquisition.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 47(5):1194-212. PubMed ID: 15603471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Individual differences in the influence of phonological characteristics on expressive vocabulary development by young children.
    Maekawa J; Storkel HL
    J Child Lang; 2006 Aug; 33(3):439-59. PubMed ID: 17017275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nonword Repetition and Vocabulary Knowledge as Predictors of Children's Phonological and Semantic Word Learning.
    Adlof SM; Patten H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 60(3):682-693. PubMed ID: 28241284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Independent Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Lexical Acquisition by Preschool Children.
    Storkel HL; Lee SY
    Lang Cogn Process; 2011; 26(2):191-211. PubMed ID: 21643455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of Vocabulary and Phonotactic Probability on 2-Year-Olds' Nonword Repetition.
    Verhagen J; de Bree E; Mulder H; Leseman P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Jun; 46(3):507-524. PubMed ID: 27612854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Online learning from input versus offline memory evolution in adult word learning: effects of neighborhood density and phonologically related practice.
    Storkel HL; Bontempo DE; Pak NS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1708-21. PubMed ID: 24686841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Beyond phonotactic frequency: presentation frequency effects word productions in specific language impairment.
    Plante E; Bahl M; Vance R; Gerken L
    J Commun Disord; 2011; 44(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 20727533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of vocabulary size, phonotactic probability, and wordlikeness on nonword repetitions of children with and without specific language impairment.
    Munson B; Kurtz BA; Windsor J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1033-47. PubMed ID: 16411794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Finding patterns and learning words: Infant phonotactic knowledge is associated with vocabulary size.
    Graf Estes K; Gluck SC; Grimm KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Jun; 146():34-49. PubMed ID: 26905502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Cross-Sectional Comparison of the Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Word Learning by Preschool Children.
    Hoover JR; Storkel HL; Hogan TP
    J Mem Lang; 2010 Jul; 63(1):100-116. PubMed ID: 20563243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fast mapping and word learning by preschoolers with specific language impairment in a supported learning context: effect of encoding cues, phonotactic probability, and object familiarity.
    Gray S; Brinkley S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):870-84. PubMed ID: 20966382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Identifying nonwords: effects of lexical neighborhoods, phonotactic probability, and listener characteristics.
    Janse E; Newman RS
    Lang Speech; 2013 Dec; 56(Pt 4):421-41. PubMed ID: 24597272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The sensitivity of children with SLI to phonotactic probabilities during lexical access.
    Quémart P; Maillart C
    J Commun Disord; 2016; 61():48-59. PubMed ID: 27023739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lexical and phonological organization in children: evidence from repetition tasks.
    Munson B; Swenson CL; Manthei SC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 48(1):108-24. PubMed ID: 15938063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Phonological Learning Influences Label-Object Mapping in Toddlers.
    Breen E; Pomper R; Saffran J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 62(6):1923-1932. PubMed ID: 31170356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Phonological and lexical effects in verbal recall by children with specific language impairments.
    Coady JA; Mainela-Arnold E; Evans JL
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(2):144-59. PubMed ID: 23472955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Learning new words II: Phonotactic probability in verb learning.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Dec; 46(6):1312-23. PubMed ID: 14700357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Wordlikeness and word learning in children with hearing loss.
    Stiles DJ; McGregor KK; Bentler RA
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 23472959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.