These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23882005)

  • 41. A "bat" is easier to learn than a "tab": effects of relative phonotactic frequency on infant word learning.
    Gonzalez-Gomez N; Poltrock S; Nazzi T
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59601. PubMed ID: 23527227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Wordlikeness and word learning in children with hearing loss.
    Stiles DJ; McGregor KK; Bentler RA
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 23472959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Novel-word learning deficits in Mandarin-speaking preschool children with specific language impairments.
    Chen Y; Liu HM
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Jan; 35(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 24211792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Phonotactic probability effects in children who stutter.
    Anderson JD; Byrd CT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 51(4):851-66. PubMed ID: 18658056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An online calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on the basis of child corpora of spoken American English.
    Storkel HL; Hoover JR
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):497-506. PubMed ID: 20479181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Two-year-old children's processing of two-word sequences occurring 19 or more times per million and their influence on subsequent word learning.
    Jones G; Cabiddu F; Avila-Varela DS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Nov; 199():104922. PubMed ID: 32702556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. What can Neighbourhood Density effects tell us about word learning? Insights from a connectionist model of vocabulary development.
    Takac M; Knott A; Stokes S
    J Child Lang; 2017 Mar; 44(2):346-379. PubMed ID: 26884360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Phonological neighborhood measures and multisyllabic word acquisition in children.
    Rajaram M
    J Child Lang; 2022 Jan; 49(1):197-212. PubMed ID: 33757614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Developmental differences in the effects of phonological, lexical and semantic variables on word learning by infants.
    Storkel HL
    J Child Lang; 2009 Mar; 36(2):291-321. PubMed ID: 18761757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of prior phonotactic knowledge on infant word segmentation: the case of nonadjacent dependencies.
    Gonzalez-Gomez N; Nazzi T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):840-9. PubMed ID: 23275409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Lexical and phonological effects in early word production.
    Sosa AV; Stoel-Gammon C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 55(2):596-608. PubMed ID: 22207699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparing Word Characteristic Effects on Vocabulary of Children with Cochlear Implants.
    Lund E
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2019 Oct; 24(4):424-434. PubMed ID: 31037301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Early effects of neighborhood density and phonotactic probability of spoken words on event-related potentials.
    Hunter CR
    Brain Lang; 2013 Dec; 127(3):463-74. PubMed ID: 24129200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The influence of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on children's production of newly learned words.
    Heisler L; Goffman L
    Lang Learn Dev; 2016; 12(3):338-356. PubMed ID: 27284274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Neighborhood Density and Word Production in Delayed and Advanced Learners.
    Jones SD; Brandt S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 62(8):2847-2854. PubMed ID: 31330120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Using Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines to Predict Lexical Characteristics' Influence on Word Learning in First Through Third Graders.
    Peters-Sanders L; Sanders H; Goldstein H; Ramachandran K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Feb; 66(2):589-604. PubMed ID: 36652710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Statistical learning in emerging lexicons: the case of Danish.
    Stokes SF; Bleses D; Basbøll H; Lambertsen C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1265-73. PubMed ID: 22337494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation.
    Brent MR; Cartwright TA
    Cognition; 1996; 61(1-2):93-125. PubMed ID: 8990969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Phonological short-term memory and new word learning in children.
    Gathercole SE; Hitch GJ; Service E; Martin AJ
    Dev Psychol; 1997 Nov; 33(6):966-79. PubMed ID: 9383619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Phonotactic influences on short-term memory.
    Gathercole SE; Frankish CR; Pickering SJ; Peaker S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 9949710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.