256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23884802)
1. Trabecular metal in total knee arthroplasty associated with higher knee scores: a randomized controlled trial.
Fernandez-Fairen M; Hernández-Vaquero D; Murcia A; Torres A; Llopis R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Nov; 471(11):3543-53. PubMed ID: 23884802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Mark Coventry Award: Trabecular metal tibial components were durable and reliable in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.
Pulido L; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Stuart MJ; Sanchez-Sotelo J; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 24687433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does Robotic-assisted TKA Result in Better Outcome Scores or Long-Term Survivorship Than Conventional TKA? A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Kim YH; Yoon SH; Park JW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 478(2):266-275. PubMed ID: 31389889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibia vs Cemented Modular Tibia in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.
Hu B; Chen Y; Zhu H; Wu H; Yan S
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):666-674. PubMed ID: 27776898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uncemented tantalum metal components versus cemented tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: 11- to 15-year outcomes of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Hampton M; Mansoor J; Getty J; Sutton PM
Bone Joint J; 2020 Aug; 102-B(8):1025-1032. PubMed ID: 32731836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Component: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
De Martino I; D'Apolito R; Sculco PK; Poultsides LA; Gasparini G
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2193-8. PubMed ID: 27172865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 2017 Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: Does Computer Navigation in Knee Arthroplasty Improve Functional Outcomes in Young Patients? A Randomized Study.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jan; 476(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 29389753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uncemented Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Fixation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 60 Years of Age: Mean 10-Year Follow-up.
DeFrancesco CJ; Canseco JA; Nelson CL; Israelite CL; Kamath AF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 May; 100(10):865-870. PubMed ID: 29762282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Results of Cemented vs Cementless Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Same Implant Design.
Miller AJ; Stimac JD; Smith LS; Feher AW; Yakkanti MR; Malkani AL
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Apr; 33(4):1089-1093. PubMed ID: 29275115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty with tantalum monoblock tibial component and cemented tibial plateau prosthesis in patients of different ages].
Jiao Y; Zhang X; Askar Mamtimin ; Xu B; Li G; Cao L
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Dec; 35(12):1563-1573. PubMed ID: 34913313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Midterm Comparison of Tibial Fixation between Posterior Cruciate-Retaining and Substituting Porous Tantalum Total Knee Arthroplasty: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis.
Kaneko T; Kono N; Mochizuki Y; Hada M; Toyoda S; Ikegami H; Musha Y
J Knee Surg; 2021 Jan; 34(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 31288269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The 2018 Mark Coventry, MD Award: Does a Ceramic Bearing Improve Pain, Function, Wear, or Survivorship of TKA in Patients Younger Than 55 Years of Age? A Randomized Trial.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jan; 477(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 30794228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects.
Eder-Halbedl M; Fink A; Pietsch M; Djahani O; Hofmann S
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Dec; 31(12):5496-5506. PubMed ID: 37819600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review.
Limberg AK; Tibbo ME; Pagnano MW; Perry KI; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):458-462. PubMed ID: 32228079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mid-term results of total knee arthroplasty with a porous tantalum monoblock tibial component.
Hayakawa K; Date H; Tsujimura S; Nojiri S; Yamada H; Nakagawa K
Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):199-203. PubMed ID: 23871406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. No Difference in 5-year Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment in TKA: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Young SW; Sullivan NPT; Walker ML; Holland S; Bayan A; Farrington B
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1271-1279. PubMed ID: 32039955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision TKA with a condylar constrained prosthesis using metaphyseal and surface cementation: a minimum 6-year follow-up analysis.
Sanz-Ruiz P; Villanueva-Martínez M; Matas-Diez JA; Vaquero-Martín J
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Feb; 16():39. PubMed ID: 25888058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective results of uncemented tantalum monoblock tibia in total knee arthroplasty: minimum 5-year follow-up in patients younger than 55 years.
Kamath AF; Lee GC; Sheth NP; Nelson CL; Garino JP; Israelite CL
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1390-5. PubMed ID: 21872424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tantalum Cementless Versus Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Level 1 Studies.
Peddada KV; Delman CM; Holland CT; Meehan JP; Lum ZC
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev; 2023 Apr; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 37027225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of bone mineral density between porous tantalum and cemented tibial total knee arthroplasty components.
Minoda Y; Kobayashi A; Iwaki H; Ikebuchi M; Inori F; Takaoka K
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 92(3):700-6. PubMed ID: 20194329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]