These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23884943)

  • 1. Error-monitoring and post-error compensations: dissociation between perceptual failures and motor errors with and without awareness.
    Navarro-Cebrian A; Knight RT; Kayser AS
    J Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 33(30):12375-83. PubMed ID: 23884943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid adaptive adjustments of selective attention following errors revealed by the time course of steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Steinhauser M; Andersen SK
    Neuroimage; 2019 Feb; 186():83-92. PubMed ID: 30366075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Error-related brain activity and error awareness in an error classification paradigm.
    Di Gregorio F; Steinhauser M; Maier ME
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 139():202-210. PubMed ID: 27296011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance monitoring mechanisms activated before and after a response: A comparison of aware and unaware errors.
    Hoonakker M; Doignon-Camus N; Bonnefond A
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Oct; 120():53-60. PubMed ID: 27568326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ERP correlates of conscious error recognition: aware and unaware errors in an antisaccade task.
    Endrass T; Reuter B; Kathmann N
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 26(6):1714-20. PubMed ID: 17880402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speeded response errors and the error-related negativity modulate early sensory processing.
    Beatty PJ; Buzzell GA; Roberts DM; McDonald CG
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():112-120. PubMed ID: 30096369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural Signatures of Conscious Face Perception in an Inattentional Blindness Paradigm.
    Shafto JP; Pitts MA
    J Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 35(31):10940-8. PubMed ID: 26245958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subjective visual awareness emerges prior to P3.
    Koivisto M; Salminen-Vaparanta N; Grassini S; Revonsuo A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 43(12):1601-11. PubMed ID: 27109009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lesions to the prefrontal performance-monitoring network disrupt neural processing and adaptive behaviors after both errors and novelty.
    Wessel JR; Klein TA; Ott DV; Ullsperger M
    Cortex; 2014 Jan; 50():45-54. PubMed ID: 24139890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unavoidable errors: a spatio-temporal analysis of time-course and neural sources of evoked potentials associated with error processing in a speeded task.
    Vocat R; Pourtois G; Vuilleumier P
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Aug; 46(10):2545-55. PubMed ID: 18533202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural correlates of error processing reflect individual differences in interoceptive sensitivity.
    Sueyoshi T; Sugimoto F; Katayama J; Fukushima H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Dec; 94(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 25307770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prefrontal neuromodulation using rTMS improves error monitoring and correction function in autism.
    Sokhadze EM; Baruth JM; Sears L; Sokhadze GE; El-Baz AS; Casanova MF
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2012 Jun; 37(2):91-102. PubMed ID: 22311204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinguishing between types of errors and adjustments.
    Schroder HS; Infantolino ZP
    J Neurosci; 2013 Nov; 33(47):18356-7. PubMed ID: 24259560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cascade of neural events leading from error commission to subsequent awareness revealed using EEG source imaging.
    Dhar M; Wiersema JR; Pourtois G
    PLoS One; 2011 May; 6(5):e19578. PubMed ID: 21573173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oops!.. I did it again: an ERP and behavioral study of double-errors.
    Hajcak G; Simons RF
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 18442875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why do we make mistakes? Neurocognitive processes during the preparation-perception-action cycle and error-detection.
    Perri RL; Berchicci M; Lucci G; Spinelli D; Di Russo F
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jun; 113():320-8. PubMed ID: 25812715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the positive side of error processing: error-awareness positivity revisited.
    Shalgi S; Barkan I; Deouell LY
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 29(7):1522-32. PubMed ID: 19519632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Error detection in patients with lesions to the medial prefrontal cortex: an ERP study.
    Stemmer B; Segalowitz SJ; Witzke W; Schönle PW
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(1):118-30. PubMed ID: 14615082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Joint effects of sensory feedback and interoceptive awareness on conscious error detection: Evidence from event related brain potentials.
    Godefroid E; Pourtois G; Wiersema JR
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Feb; 114():49-60. PubMed ID: 26738634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the error-related negativity amplitude related to error detectability? Evidence from effects of different error types.
    Maier M; Steinhauser M; Hübner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2263-73. PubMed ID: 18457501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.