These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23886407)

  • 1. Range of motion in a modular femoral stem system with a variety of neck options.
    Hariri S; Chun S; Cowan JB; Bragdon C; Malchau H; Rubash HE
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1625-33. PubMed ID: 23886407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.
    Hisatome T; Doi H
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Matsushita A; Nakashima Y; Jingushi S; Yamamoto T; Kuraoka A; Iwamoto Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):646-51. PubMed ID: 18534445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modular neck for prevention of prosthetic impingement in cases with excessively anteverted femur.
    Miki H; Sugano N
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Nov; 26(9):944-9. PubMed ID: 21680069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.
    Girard J; Krantz N; Bocquet D; Wavreille G; Migaud H
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement.
    Kluess D; Martin H; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 May; 29(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 16901743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impingement after total hip arthroplasty related to prosthetic component selection and range of motion.
    Gondi G; Roberson JR; Ganey TM; Shahriari A; Hutton WC
    J South Orthop Assoc; 1997; 6(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 9434247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-Dimensional Functional Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Analysis.
    Debbi EM; Quevedo González FJ; Jerabek SA; Wright TM; Vigdorchik JM
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul; 37(7S):S678-S684. PubMed ID: 35271980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The incidence of femoral component version change in primary THA using the S-ROM femoral component.
    Kindsfater KA; Politi JR; Dennis DA; Sychterz Terefenko CJ
    Orthopedics; 2011 Apr; 34(4):. PubMed ID: 21469634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter.
    Kluess D; Zietz C; Lindner T; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty.
    Higa M; Tanino H; Abo M; Kakunai S; Banks SA
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 21529811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.
    Widmer KH; Zurfluh B
    J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 15183439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neck-modular femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty.
    Goyal N; Hozack WJ
    Surg Technol Int; 2010 Oct; 20():309-13. PubMed ID: 21082579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint.
    Bartz RL; Nobel PC; Kadakia NR; Tullos HS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Sep; 82(9):1300-7. PubMed ID: 11005521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of Pelvic Tilt and Femoral Head Size on Hip Range-of-Motion to Impingement.
    McCarthy TF; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Alipit V; Wagner TC; Mont MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3544-3549. PubMed ID: 28712801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modular necks improve the range of hip motion in cases with excessively anteverted or retroverted femurs in THA.
    Matsushita A; Nakashima Y; Fujii M; Sato T; Iwamoto Y
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 468(12):3342-7. PubMed ID: 20473596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements.
    Yoshimine F
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Application progress of Sivash-range of motion femoral modular stem prosthesis in developmental dysplasia of hip and hip revision].
    Zhao Z; Sun J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1054-7. PubMed ID: 23057345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical results of a modular neck hip system: hitting the "bull's-eye" more accurately.
    Duwelius PJ; Hartzband MA; Burkhart R; Carnahan C; Blair S; Wu Y; Grunkemeier GL
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2010 Oct; 39(10 Suppl):2-6. PubMed ID: 21290013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty.
    Vendittoli PA; Ganapathi M; Nuño N; Plamondon D; Lavigne M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.