These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23886407)

  • 21. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation.
    Barrack RL
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2003; 11(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 12670135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A modular femoral neck and head system works well in cementless total hip replacement for patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.
    Sakai T; Ohzono K; Nishii T; Miki H; Takao M; Sugano N
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Jun; 92(6):770-6. PubMed ID: 20513871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone.
    Yoshimine F
    J Biomech; 2005 Jan; 38(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 15519347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Femoral component positioning in resurfacing arthroplasty--effects on cortical strains.
    Kummer FJ; Pereira G; Schachter AK; Jaffe WL
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 20001936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Impingement Free Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - How Can We Implement It?].
    Widmer KH
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 27336842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The proximal modular neck in THA: a bridge too far: affirms.
    Dunbar MJ
    Orthopedics; 2010 Sep; 33(9):640. PubMed ID: 20839691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A case of disassociation of a modular femoral neck trunion after total hip arthroplasty.
    Sporer SM; DellaValle C; Jacobs J; Wimmer M
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):918-21. PubMed ID: 16950051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The tridimensional geometry of the proximal femur should determine the design of cementless femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty.
    Wegrzyn J; Roux JP; Loriau C; Bonin N; Pibarot V
    Int Orthop; 2018 Oct; 42(10):2329-2334. PubMed ID: 29468265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of two implant systems in restoration of hip geometry in arthroplasty.
    Archibeck MJ; Cummins T; Carothers J; Junick DW; White RE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Feb; 469(2):443-6. PubMed ID: 21082363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modular Versus Nonmodular Femoral Necks for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Carothers JT; Archibeck MJ; Tripuraneni KR
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2015 Sep; 44(9):411-4. PubMed ID: 26372750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A bench-top method for evaluating modular total hip component combinations.
    Uhl RL; Williamson SC; Williams R; Andrews W; Hutchison J
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2000 Apr; 29(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 10784019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Association between dislocation, impingement, and articular geometry in retrieved acetabular polyethylene cups.
    Tanino H; Harman MK; Banks SA; Hodge WA
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1401-7. PubMed ID: 17471491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs.
    Bengs BC; Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):755-62. PubMed ID: 19085491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Painful impingement of the hip joint after total hip resurfacing: a report of two cases.
    Lavigne M; Rama KR; Roy A; Vendittoli PA
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1074-9. PubMed ID: 18534499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The S-rOM modular femoral stem in dysplasia of the hip.
    Mattingly DA
    Orthopedics; 2005 Sep; 28(9 Suppl):s1069-73. PubMed ID: 16190039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Loosening of total hip arthroplasty with a prosthesis employing a skirted femoral head.
    Chen PY; Wu CT; Hou CH; Hou SM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2005 May; 104(5):370-3. PubMed ID: 15959607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do.
    Crowninshield RD; Maloney WJ; Wentz DH; Humphrey SM; Blanchard CR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Dec; (429):102-7. PubMed ID: 15577473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of stem offset and neck shaft angles on the range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Shoji T; Yamasaki T; Izumi S; Hachisuka S; Ochi M
    Int Orthop; 2016 Feb; 40(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 26224610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
    Widmer KH; Majewski M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.