720 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23886425)
1. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
Ricketts TA; Picou EM
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of a reverse cardioid directional microphone.
Kuk F; Keenan D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 22284842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring listening effort: driving simulator versus simple dual-task paradigm.
Wu YH; Aksan N; Rizzo M; Stangl E; Zhang X; Bentler R
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):623-32. PubMed ID: 25083599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Potential Benefits and Limitations of Noise-Management Technologies for Children with Hearing Aids.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Miller S; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Dunn A; Browning S; Neumann S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Feb; 33(2):66-74. PubMed ID: 35512843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction on Subcortical and Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials in Older Listeners With Hearing Loss.
Slugocki C; Kuk F; Korhonen P
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1282-1293. PubMed ID: 32058351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Evaluation of Hearing Aid Beamforming Microphone Arrays in a Noisy Laboratory Setting.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):131-144. PubMed ID: 30461406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part II--field tests.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 19773657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hearing-aid users' voices: a factor that could affect directional benefit.
Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA
Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):789-94. PubMed ID: 23777478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Symmetrical and asymmetrical directional benefits are present for talkers at the front and side.
Ricketts TA; Picou EM
Int J Audiol; 2022 Mar; 61(3):177-186. PubMed ID: 34106803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An objective measure for selecting microphone modes in OMNI/DIR hearing aid circuits.
Grant KW; Elhilali M; Shamma SA; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT; Summers V
Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 18595186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a "direct-comparison" approach to automatic switching in omnidirectional/directional hearing aids.
Summers V; Grant KW; Walden BE; Cord MT; Surr RK; Elhilali M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Oct; 19(9):708-20. PubMed ID: 19418710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a BICROS System with a Directional Microphone in the Receiver and Transmitter.
Valente M; Oeding K
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):856-71. PubMed ID: 26554490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields.
Ricketts TA; Henry PP; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 16230897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Measure Hearing Aid Benefit.
Kuk F; Seper E; Lau CC; Korhonen P
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Sep; 28(8):698-707. PubMed ID: 28906241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
