130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23887047)
1. Competitive guided search: meeting the challenge of benchmark RT distributions.
Moran R; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ; Usher M
J Vis; 2013 Jul; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 23887047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions.
Moran R; Zehetleitner M; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ; Usher M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1300-1315. PubMed ID: 26635097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Missed targets are more frequent than false alarms: a model for error rates in visual search.
Zenger B; Fahle M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Dec; 23(6):1783-91. PubMed ID: 9425680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling visual search using three-parameter probability functions in a hierarchical Bayesian framework.
Lin YS; Heinke D; Humphreys GW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):985-1010. PubMed ID: 25678272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reaction time distributions constrain models of visual search.
Wolfe JM; Palmer EM; Horowitz TS
Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19895828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. GSDT: An integrative model of visual search.
Schwarz W; Miller J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1654-75. PubMed ID: 27336631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How priming in visual search affects response time distributions: analyses with ex-Gaussian fits.
Kristjánsson A; Jóhannesson OI
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2199-211. PubMed ID: 25073610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual search deficits in Parkinson's disease are attenuated by bottom-up target salience and top-down information.
Horowitz TS; Choi WY; Horvitz JC; Côté LJ; Mangels JA
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1962-77. PubMed ID: 16580700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Serial correlations and 1/f power spectra in visual search reaction times.
McIlhagga W
J Vis; 2008 Jul; 8(9):5.1-14. PubMed ID: 18831641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance.
Chen X; Zelinsky GJ
Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(24):4118-33. PubMed ID: 17005231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Studying the dynamics of visual search behavior using RT hazard and micro-level speed-accuracy tradeoff functions: A role for recurrent object recognition and cognitive control processes.
Panis S; Moran R; Wolkersdorfer MP; Schmidt T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):689-714. PubMed ID: 31942704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing target detection errors in visual search and manually-assisted search.
Solman GJ; Hickey K; Smilek D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):945-58. PubMed ID: 24554230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search.
Cave KR; Wolfe JM
Cogn Psychol; 1990 Apr; 22(2):225-71. PubMed ID: 2331857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sources of top-down control in visual search.
Weidner R; Krummenacher J; Reimann B; Müller HJ; Fink GR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2100-13. PubMed ID: 19199412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. To quit or not to quit in dynamic search.
Shi Z; Allenmark F; Zhu X; Elliott MA; Müller HJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):799-817. PubMed ID: 31468326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attentional control in visual signal detection: effects of abrupt-onset and no-onset stimuli.
Sewell DK; Smith PL
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):1043-68. PubMed ID: 22201464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A computational model reveals classical conditioning mechanisms underlying visual signal detection in rats.
Schmajuk NA; Bushnell PJ
Behav Processes; 2009 Nov; 82(3):340-51. PubMed ID: 19699786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On computational Gestalt detection thresholds.
Grompone von Gioi R; Jakubowicz J
J Physiol Paris; 2009; 103(1-2):4-17. PubMed ID: 19477276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The psychophysics of visual search.
Palmer J; Verghese P; Pavel M
Vision Res; 2000; 40(10-12):1227-68. PubMed ID: 10788638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search?
Palmer EM; Horowitz TS; Torralba A; Wolfe JM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 21090905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
